Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Everyone counts? Design considerations in onlin...

Electronic data

  • Everyone counts - accepted version

    Accepted author manuscript, 2.36 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. / Spiers, Helen; Swanson, Alexandra; Fortson, Lucy et al.
In: Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 18, No. 1, A04, 17.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Spiers, H, Swanson, A, Fortson, L, Simmons, BD, Trouille, L, Blickhan, S & Lintott, C 2019, 'Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science', Journal of Science Communication, vol. 18, no. 1, A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010204

APA

Spiers, H., Swanson, A., Fortson, L., Simmons, B. D., Trouille, L., Blickhan, S., & Lintott, C. (2019). Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 18(1), Article A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010204

Vancouver

Spiers H, Swanson A, Fortson L, Simmons BD, Trouille L, Blickhan S et al. Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication. 2019 Jan 17;18(1):A04. Epub 2019 Jan 17. doi: 10.22323/2.18010204

Author

Spiers, Helen ; Swanson, Alexandra ; Fortson, Lucy et al. / Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. In: Journal of Science Communication. 2019 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{eb6d07a856be4a788cd99944c33151ce,
title = "Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science",
abstract = "Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.",
keywords = "Citizen science, Public engagement with science and technology, Social inclusion",
author = "Helen Spiers and Alexandra Swanson and Lucy Fortson and Simmons, {Brooke D.} and Laura Trouille and Samantha Blickhan and Chris Lintott",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "17",
doi = "10.22323/2.18010204",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Science Communication",
issn = "1824-2049",
publisher = "Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science

AU - Spiers, Helen

AU - Swanson, Alexandra

AU - Fortson, Lucy

AU - Simmons, Brooke D.

AU - Trouille, Laura

AU - Blickhan, Samantha

AU - Lintott, Chris

PY - 2019/1/17

Y1 - 2019/1/17

N2 - Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.

AB - Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.

KW - Citizen science

KW - Public engagement with science and technology

KW - Social inclusion

U2 - 10.22323/2.18010204

DO - 10.22323/2.18010204

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Science Communication

JF - Journal of Science Communication

SN - 1824-2049

IS - 1

M1 - A04

ER -