Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Explaining reproductive health inequalities amo...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Explaining reproductive health inequalities amongst people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-narrative review protocol

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Explaining reproductive health inequalities amongst people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-narrative review protocol. / Kaley, Alexandra ; Eastham, Rachael; McMahon, Martin et al.
In: BMJ Open, Vol. 14, No. 12, e085459, 07.12.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kaley A, Eastham R, McMahon M, Merrett N. Explaining reproductive health inequalities amongst people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-narrative review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e085459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459

Author

Bibtex

@article{0f6e0fd710d14d8eb9ab0008e4a4d6ae,
title = "Explaining reproductive health inequalities amongst people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-narrative review protocol",
abstract = "Introduction: People with intellectual disabilities experience health inequalities at a greater level than their non-disabled peers. Notably, while general health status is starting to receive some attention, the reproductive health and rights of people with intellectual disabilities continue to be understudied from a policy and research perspective. The objective of this review is to elucidate the complex interplay between individual, social and structural factors that influence reproductive health outcomes for this population. The findings will be used to develop a theoretical framework to explain how and why reproductive health inequalities persist for people with intellectual disabilities and to identify gaps in the knowledge base to inform future research on this topic. Methods and analysis: A six-stage meta-narrative review will be undertaken to synthesise the available evidence that seeks to explain the reproductive health inequalities experienced by people with intellectual disabilities and the factors contributing to these inequalities. The protocol for this review was developed in accordance with the Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards publication standards, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol guideline is completed to ensure transparency. Ethics and dissemination: This meta-narrative review protocol does not require formal ethics review because it will be based on published studies. The findings from this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. We will also produce our findings in a range of accessible and easy-to-read formats. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024495199.",
author = "Alexandra Kaley and Rachael Eastham and Martin McMahon and Nicola Merrett",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining reproductive health inequalities amongst people with intellectual disabilities

T2 - a meta-narrative review protocol

AU - Kaley, Alexandra

AU - Eastham, Rachael

AU - McMahon, Martin

AU - Merrett, Nicola

PY - 2024/12/7

Y1 - 2024/12/7

N2 - Introduction: People with intellectual disabilities experience health inequalities at a greater level than their non-disabled peers. Notably, while general health status is starting to receive some attention, the reproductive health and rights of people with intellectual disabilities continue to be understudied from a policy and research perspective. The objective of this review is to elucidate the complex interplay between individual, social and structural factors that influence reproductive health outcomes for this population. The findings will be used to develop a theoretical framework to explain how and why reproductive health inequalities persist for people with intellectual disabilities and to identify gaps in the knowledge base to inform future research on this topic. Methods and analysis: A six-stage meta-narrative review will be undertaken to synthesise the available evidence that seeks to explain the reproductive health inequalities experienced by people with intellectual disabilities and the factors contributing to these inequalities. The protocol for this review was developed in accordance with the Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards publication standards, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol guideline is completed to ensure transparency. Ethics and dissemination: This meta-narrative review protocol does not require formal ethics review because it will be based on published studies. The findings from this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. We will also produce our findings in a range of accessible and easy-to-read formats. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024495199.

AB - Introduction: People with intellectual disabilities experience health inequalities at a greater level than their non-disabled peers. Notably, while general health status is starting to receive some attention, the reproductive health and rights of people with intellectual disabilities continue to be understudied from a policy and research perspective. The objective of this review is to elucidate the complex interplay between individual, social and structural factors that influence reproductive health outcomes for this population. The findings will be used to develop a theoretical framework to explain how and why reproductive health inequalities persist for people with intellectual disabilities and to identify gaps in the knowledge base to inform future research on this topic. Methods and analysis: A six-stage meta-narrative review will be undertaken to synthesise the available evidence that seeks to explain the reproductive health inequalities experienced by people with intellectual disabilities and the factors contributing to these inequalities. The protocol for this review was developed in accordance with the Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards publication standards, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol guideline is completed to ensure transparency. Ethics and dissemination: This meta-narrative review protocol does not require formal ethics review because it will be based on published studies. The findings from this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. We will also produce our findings in a range of accessible and easy-to-read formats. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024495199.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 12

M1 - e085459

ER -