Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK: a narrative synthesis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK: a narrative synthesis. / French, M.; Keegan, T.; Anestis, E. et al.
In: BMC Palliative Care, Vol. 20, No. 1, 179, 21.11.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{e2f0ba08f4184badaa746086cbff0b32,
title = "Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK: a narrative synthesis",
abstract = "Background: Efforts inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care require comprehensive understanding about the extent of and reasons for inequities. Most research on this topic examines differences in receipt of care. There is a need, particularly in the UK, for theoretically driven research that considers both receipt of care and the wider factors influencing the relationship between socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care. Methods: This is a mixed studies narrative synthesis on socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Study searches were conducted in databases AMED, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SocIndex, and Academic Literature Search, as well as grey literature sources, in July 2020. The candidacy model of access, which describes access as a seven-stage negotiation between patients and providers, guided study searches and provided a theoretical lens through which data were synthesised. Results: Searches retrieved 5303 studies (after de-duplication), 29 of which were included. The synthesis generated four overarching themes, within which concepts of candidacy were evident: identifying needs; taking action; local conditions; and receiving care. Conclusion: There is not a consistent or clear narrative regarding the relationship between socioeconomic position and receipt of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Attempts to address any inequities in access will require knowledge and action across many different areas. Key evidence gaps in the UK literature concern the relationship between socioeconomic position, organisational context, and assessing need for care. {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
keywords = "Access to healthcare, End-of-life care, Healthcare utilisation, Palliative care, Socioeconomic position, adult, article, Cinahl, Embase, female, grey literature, health care utilization, human, male, Medline, narrative, negotiation, palliative therapy, synthesis, systematic review, terminal care, theoretical study",
author = "M. French and T. Keegan and E. Anestis and N. Preston",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s12904-021-00878-0",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "BMC Palliative Care",
issn = "1472-684X",
publisher = "BIOMED CENTRAL LTD",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK: a narrative synthesis

AU - French, M.

AU - Keegan, T.

AU - Anestis, E.

AU - Preston, N.

PY - 2021/11/21

Y1 - 2021/11/21

N2 - Background: Efforts inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care require comprehensive understanding about the extent of and reasons for inequities. Most research on this topic examines differences in receipt of care. There is a need, particularly in the UK, for theoretically driven research that considers both receipt of care and the wider factors influencing the relationship between socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care. Methods: This is a mixed studies narrative synthesis on socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Study searches were conducted in databases AMED, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SocIndex, and Academic Literature Search, as well as grey literature sources, in July 2020. The candidacy model of access, which describes access as a seven-stage negotiation between patients and providers, guided study searches and provided a theoretical lens through which data were synthesised. Results: Searches retrieved 5303 studies (after de-duplication), 29 of which were included. The synthesis generated four overarching themes, within which concepts of candidacy were evident: identifying needs; taking action; local conditions; and receiving care. Conclusion: There is not a consistent or clear narrative regarding the relationship between socioeconomic position and receipt of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Attempts to address any inequities in access will require knowledge and action across many different areas. Key evidence gaps in the UK literature concern the relationship between socioeconomic position, organisational context, and assessing need for care. © 2021, The Author(s).

AB - Background: Efforts inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care require comprehensive understanding about the extent of and reasons for inequities. Most research on this topic examines differences in receipt of care. There is a need, particularly in the UK, for theoretically driven research that considers both receipt of care and the wider factors influencing the relationship between socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care. Methods: This is a mixed studies narrative synthesis on socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Study searches were conducted in databases AMED, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SocIndex, and Academic Literature Search, as well as grey literature sources, in July 2020. The candidacy model of access, which describes access as a seven-stage negotiation between patients and providers, guided study searches and provided a theoretical lens through which data were synthesised. Results: Searches retrieved 5303 studies (after de-duplication), 29 of which were included. The synthesis generated four overarching themes, within which concepts of candidacy were evident: identifying needs; taking action; local conditions; and receiving care. Conclusion: There is not a consistent or clear narrative regarding the relationship between socioeconomic position and receipt of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Attempts to address any inequities in access will require knowledge and action across many different areas. Key evidence gaps in the UK literature concern the relationship between socioeconomic position, organisational context, and assessing need for care. © 2021, The Author(s).

KW - Access to healthcare

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Healthcare utilisation

KW - Palliative care

KW - Socioeconomic position

KW - adult

KW - article

KW - Cinahl

KW - Embase

KW - female

KW - grey literature

KW - health care utilization

KW - human

KW - male

KW - Medline

KW - narrative

KW - negotiation

KW - palliative therapy

KW - synthesis

KW - systematic review

KW - terminal care

KW - theoretical study

U2 - 10.1186/s12904-021-00878-0

DO - 10.1186/s12904-021-00878-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

JO - BMC Palliative Care

JF - BMC Palliative Care

SN - 1472-684X

IS - 1

M1 - 179

ER -