Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fast-tracking Trust

Electronic data

  • manuscript_JAOI_Final

    Accepted author manuscript, 189 KB, Word document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Fast-tracking Trust: Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Fast-tracking Trust: Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions. / Hillner, Lina; Hope, Lorraine; Kontogianni, Feni et al.
In: Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence, Vol. 1, No. 1, 12.03.2025, p. 149-182.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hillner, L, Hope, L, Kontogianni, F, Conchie, S & Nunan, J 2025, 'Fast-tracking Trust: Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions', Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 149-182. https://doi.org/10.5750/jaoi.v1i1.2293

APA

Hillner, L., Hope, L., Kontogianni, F., Conchie, S., & Nunan, J. (2025). Fast-tracking Trust: Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions. Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence, 1(1), 149-182. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5750/jaoi.v1i1.2293

Vancouver

Hillner L, Hope L, Kontogianni F, Conchie S, Nunan J. Fast-tracking Trust: Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions. Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence. 2025 Mar 12;1(1):149-182. Epub 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.5750/jaoi.v1i1.2293

Author

Hillner, Lina ; Hope, Lorraine ; Kontogianni, Feni et al. / Fast-tracking Trust : Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions. In: Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence. 2025 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 149-182.

Bibtex

@article{41ac56db873c4bbeabb69e519d310aef,
title = "Fast-tracking Trust: Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions",
abstract = "Introduction: Demonstrating trustworthiness has been shown to increase trust and, in turn, information sharing in investigative interviews. However, the most effective ways to build trust in security contexts and the role of trust demonstrations in informant-handler relationships remain underexplored. This study tests the relative importance of competence, integrity, and benevolence demonstrations on initial trust development and willingness to cooperate in remote informant-handler encounters.Methods: Using a within-subject design, participants received background information on an organised crime scenario and listened to three simulated phone call recordings, where handlers demonstrated each of the three factors of trustworthiness during attempts to recruit an informant. After each recording, participants rated the handler{\textquoteright}s trustworthiness and their own willingness to trust and cooperate and provided written feedback on each call. Participants also expressed their preferred trust-building strategy used by handlers and rated their trust propensity.Results: A repeated measures ANCOVA revealed no significant differences in willingness to trust based on the type of trustworthiness demonstration. However, trust propensity significantly impacted trust levels, so that more trusting individuals were more likely to trust the handler. Thematic analyses highlighted substantial individual differences in what participants liked and disliked about each approach.Conclusions: Findings suggest that no specific demonstration of trustworthiness is more effective in fostering initial trust, indicating that handlers should tailor trust-building strategies to individuals instead of adhering to general guidelines. Future research should employ idiographic approaches to further understand how individuals perceive and react to trust-building strategies.",
author = "Lina Hillner and Lorraine Hope and Feni Kontogianni and Stacey Conchie and Jordan Nunan",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "12",
doi = "10.5750/jaoi.v1i1.2293",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "149--182",
journal = "Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence",
issn = "3029-0376",
publisher = "University of Buckingham Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast-tracking Trust

T2 - Exploring the Relative Importance of Competence, Integrity, and Benevolence in Informant-Handler Interactions

AU - Hillner, Lina

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Kontogianni, Feni

AU - Conchie, Stacey

AU - Nunan, Jordan

PY - 2025/3/12

Y1 - 2025/3/12

N2 - Introduction: Demonstrating trustworthiness has been shown to increase trust and, in turn, information sharing in investigative interviews. However, the most effective ways to build trust in security contexts and the role of trust demonstrations in informant-handler relationships remain underexplored. This study tests the relative importance of competence, integrity, and benevolence demonstrations on initial trust development and willingness to cooperate in remote informant-handler encounters.Methods: Using a within-subject design, participants received background information on an organised crime scenario and listened to three simulated phone call recordings, where handlers demonstrated each of the three factors of trustworthiness during attempts to recruit an informant. After each recording, participants rated the handler’s trustworthiness and their own willingness to trust and cooperate and provided written feedback on each call. Participants also expressed their preferred trust-building strategy used by handlers and rated their trust propensity.Results: A repeated measures ANCOVA revealed no significant differences in willingness to trust based on the type of trustworthiness demonstration. However, trust propensity significantly impacted trust levels, so that more trusting individuals were more likely to trust the handler. Thematic analyses highlighted substantial individual differences in what participants liked and disliked about each approach.Conclusions: Findings suggest that no specific demonstration of trustworthiness is more effective in fostering initial trust, indicating that handlers should tailor trust-building strategies to individuals instead of adhering to general guidelines. Future research should employ idiographic approaches to further understand how individuals perceive and react to trust-building strategies.

AB - Introduction: Demonstrating trustworthiness has been shown to increase trust and, in turn, information sharing in investigative interviews. However, the most effective ways to build trust in security contexts and the role of trust demonstrations in informant-handler relationships remain underexplored. This study tests the relative importance of competence, integrity, and benevolence demonstrations on initial trust development and willingness to cooperate in remote informant-handler encounters.Methods: Using a within-subject design, participants received background information on an organised crime scenario and listened to three simulated phone call recordings, where handlers demonstrated each of the three factors of trustworthiness during attempts to recruit an informant. After each recording, participants rated the handler’s trustworthiness and their own willingness to trust and cooperate and provided written feedback on each call. Participants also expressed their preferred trust-building strategy used by handlers and rated their trust propensity.Results: A repeated measures ANCOVA revealed no significant differences in willingness to trust based on the type of trustworthiness demonstration. However, trust propensity significantly impacted trust levels, so that more trusting individuals were more likely to trust the handler. Thematic analyses highlighted substantial individual differences in what participants liked and disliked about each approach.Conclusions: Findings suggest that no specific demonstration of trustworthiness is more effective in fostering initial trust, indicating that handlers should tailor trust-building strategies to individuals instead of adhering to general guidelines. Future research should employ idiographic approaches to further understand how individuals perceive and react to trust-building strategies.

U2 - 10.5750/jaoi.v1i1.2293

DO - 10.5750/jaoi.v1i1.2293

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 149

EP - 182

JO - Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence

JF - Journal of Applied Operational Intelligence

SN - 3029-0376

IS - 1

ER -