Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Flexible Modeling of Variable Asymmetries in Cr...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Flexible Modeling of Variable Asymmetries in Cross-Covariance Functions for Multivariate Random Fields

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>10/03/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics
Volume26
Number of pages22
Pages (from-to)1-22
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date10/09/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The geostatistical analysis of multivariate spatial data for inference as well as joint predictions (co-kriging) ordinarily relies on modeling of the marginal and cross-covariance functions. While the former quantifies the spatial dependence within variables, the latter quantifies the spatial dependence across distinct variables. The marginal covariance functions are always symmetric; however, the cross-covariance functions often exhibit asymmetries in the real data. Asymmetric cross-covariance implies change in the value of cross-covariance for interchanged locations on fixed order of variables. Such change of cross-covariance values is often caused due to the spatial delay in effect of the response of one variable on another variable. These spatial delays are common in environmental processes, especially when dynamic phenomena such as prevailing wind and ocean currents are involved. Here, we propose a novel approach to introduce flexible asymmetries in the cross-covariances of stationary multivariate covariance functions. The proposed approach involves modeling the phase component of the constrained cross-spectral features to allow for asymmetric cross-covariances. We show the capability of our proposed model to recover the cross-dependence structure and improve spatial predictions against traditionally used models through multiple simulation studies. Additionally, we illustrate our approach on a real trivariate dataset of particulate matter concentration ($$PM_2.5$$PM2.5), wind speed and relative humidity. The real data example shows that our approach outperforms the traditionally used models, in terms of model fit and spatial predictions.