Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > “Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of...

Electronic data

  • JCS_Hub_evaluation_accepted

    Accepted author manuscript, 418 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

  • JCS Hub evaluation accepted

    Accepted author manuscript, 418 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

“Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of a Community Mental Health Early Intervention Service

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

“Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of a Community Mental Health Early Intervention Service. / Parry, Sarah; Eve, Zarah; Stamou, Vasileios et al.
In: Journal of Children's Services, Vol. 18, No. 3-4, 17.11.2023, p. 233-243.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Parry S, Eve Z, Stamou V, Brockway A, Di Basilio D. “Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of a Community Mental Health Early Intervention Service. Journal of Children's Services. 2023 Nov 17;18(3-4):233-243. Epub 2023 Aug 7. doi: 10.1108/JCS-12-2021-0053

Author

Parry, Sarah ; Eve, Zarah ; Stamou, Vasileios et al. / “Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of a Community Mental Health Early Intervention Service. In: Journal of Children's Services. 2023 ; Vol. 18, No. 3-4. pp. 233-243.

Bibtex

@article{0a04ace930014cedb694cb59f11f95b3,
title = "“Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of a Community Mental Health Early Intervention Service",
abstract = "Purpose: Half of adulthood mental health challenges begin by the age of 14-years-old, making the need for early-intervention clear. This study aims to evaluate a new service model that promotes early-intervention through a community based low-intensity Hub. Design/methodology/approach: Clinical data from 2,384 young people were analysed through within-group, pre- and post-comparisons and qualitative survey, and interview data was analysed through content analysis. Findings: Overall, participants reported that they were highly satisfied with the Hub and the low-intensity brief interventions met their needs. Participants reported that learning new skills, having a place to talk and positive therapeutic relationships were beneficial. The Hub appeared to be less successful for young people with complex mental health difficulties. As a service, the adoption of the Hub model reduced waiting list times by more than half. Research limitations/implications: The quantitative data demonstrated that engaging with the Hub reduced symptoms of psychological distress. Qualitative analyses suggest that access to local, community, welcoming and “less clinical” support was beneficial, and the type of brief interventions offered was less important than therapeutic relationships. Originality/value: This is the first study of a novel “Hub” model for low-intensity brief interventions in a socio-economically deprived area of England. Local knowledge, community integrated support, therapeutic relationships and a welcoming environment were viewed as more beneficial than the type of brief interventions offered. Consequently, community spaces can be created to be therapeutic and beneficial for mental health outside of a traditional conceptualisation of clinical support.",
author = "Sarah Parry and Zarah Eve and Vasileios Stamou and Alice Brockway and {Di Basilio}, Daniela",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1108/JCS-12-2021-0053",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "233--243",
journal = "Journal of Children's Services",
issn = "1746-6660",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3-4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Friendly, Local and Welcoming” - Evaluation of a Community Mental Health Early Intervention Service

AU - Parry, Sarah

AU - Eve, Zarah

AU - Stamou, Vasileios

AU - Brockway, Alice

AU - Di Basilio, Daniela

PY - 2023/11/17

Y1 - 2023/11/17

N2 - Purpose: Half of adulthood mental health challenges begin by the age of 14-years-old, making the need for early-intervention clear. This study aims to evaluate a new service model that promotes early-intervention through a community based low-intensity Hub. Design/methodology/approach: Clinical data from 2,384 young people were analysed through within-group, pre- and post-comparisons and qualitative survey, and interview data was analysed through content analysis. Findings: Overall, participants reported that they were highly satisfied with the Hub and the low-intensity brief interventions met their needs. Participants reported that learning new skills, having a place to talk and positive therapeutic relationships were beneficial. The Hub appeared to be less successful for young people with complex mental health difficulties. As a service, the adoption of the Hub model reduced waiting list times by more than half. Research limitations/implications: The quantitative data demonstrated that engaging with the Hub reduced symptoms of psychological distress. Qualitative analyses suggest that access to local, community, welcoming and “less clinical” support was beneficial, and the type of brief interventions offered was less important than therapeutic relationships. Originality/value: This is the first study of a novel “Hub” model for low-intensity brief interventions in a socio-economically deprived area of England. Local knowledge, community integrated support, therapeutic relationships and a welcoming environment were viewed as more beneficial than the type of brief interventions offered. Consequently, community spaces can be created to be therapeutic and beneficial for mental health outside of a traditional conceptualisation of clinical support.

AB - Purpose: Half of adulthood mental health challenges begin by the age of 14-years-old, making the need for early-intervention clear. This study aims to evaluate a new service model that promotes early-intervention through a community based low-intensity Hub. Design/methodology/approach: Clinical data from 2,384 young people were analysed through within-group, pre- and post-comparisons and qualitative survey, and interview data was analysed through content analysis. Findings: Overall, participants reported that they were highly satisfied with the Hub and the low-intensity brief interventions met their needs. Participants reported that learning new skills, having a place to talk and positive therapeutic relationships were beneficial. The Hub appeared to be less successful for young people with complex mental health difficulties. As a service, the adoption of the Hub model reduced waiting list times by more than half. Research limitations/implications: The quantitative data demonstrated that engaging with the Hub reduced symptoms of psychological distress. Qualitative analyses suggest that access to local, community, welcoming and “less clinical” support was beneficial, and the type of brief interventions offered was less important than therapeutic relationships. Originality/value: This is the first study of a novel “Hub” model for low-intensity brief interventions in a socio-economically deprived area of England. Local knowledge, community integrated support, therapeutic relationships and a welcoming environment were viewed as more beneficial than the type of brief interventions offered. Consequently, community spaces can be created to be therapeutic and beneficial for mental health outside of a traditional conceptualisation of clinical support.

U2 - 10.1108/JCS-12-2021-0053

DO - 10.1108/JCS-12-2021-0053

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 233

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Children's Services

JF - Journal of Children's Services

SN - 1746-6660

IS - 3-4

ER -