Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > From Wolff to Kelsen

Links

View graph of relations

From Wolff to Kelsen: Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

From Wolff to Kelsen: Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. / Langford, Peter; Bryan, Ian.
Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. ed. / Peter Langford; Ian Bryan; John McGarry. Brill, 2019. p. 161-187 (Studies in Moral Philosophy; Vol. 14).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Langford, P & Bryan, I 2019, From Wolff to Kelsen: Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. in P Langford, I Bryan & J McGarry (eds), Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. Studies in Moral Philosophy, vol. 14, Brill, pp. 161-187. <http://brill.com/abstract/title/38841>

APA

Langford, P., & Bryan, I. (2019). From Wolff to Kelsen: Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. In P. Langford, I. Bryan, & J. McGarry (Eds.), Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition (pp. 161-187). (Studies in Moral Philosophy; Vol. 14). Brill. http://brill.com/abstract/title/38841

Vancouver

Langford P, Bryan I. From Wolff to Kelsen: Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. In Langford P, Bryan I, McGarry J, editors, Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. Brill. 2019. p. 161-187. (Studies in Moral Philosophy).

Author

Langford, Peter ; Bryan, Ian. / From Wolff to Kelsen : Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima. Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. editor / Peter Langford ; Ian Bryan ; John McGarry. Brill, 2019. pp. 161-187 (Studies in Moral Philosophy).

Bibtex

@inbook{ca9216f3c2c44d46afe91677707f72c3,
title = "From Wolff to Kelsen: Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima",
abstract = "A significant part of Kelsen{\textquoteright}s work is devoted to the theoretical and methodological separation of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen{\textquoteright}s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from Christian Wolff{\textquoteright}s Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749). The presence of this notion raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen{\textquoteright}s theoretical framework and the conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of Wolff{\textquoteright}s notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen{\textquoteright}s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion of civitas maxima in Kelsen{\textquoteright}s Das Problem der Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t und die Theorie des V{\"o}lkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen{\textquoteright}s 1926 Lecture Course ({\textquoteleft}Les Rapports de Syst{\`e}me entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International{\textquoteright}) at the l{\textquoteright}Acad{\'e}mie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.",
author = "Peter Langford and Ian Bryan",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789004390386",
series = "Studies in Moral Philosophy",
publisher = "Brill",
pages = "161--187",
editor = "Langford, {Peter } and Ian Bryan and John McGarry",
booktitle = "Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - From Wolff to Kelsen

T2 - Transformation of the Notion of Civitas Maxima

AU - Langford, Peter

AU - Bryan, Ian

PY - 2019/3/19

Y1 - 2019/3/19

N2 - A significant part of Kelsen’s work is devoted to the theoretical and methodological separation of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen’s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from Christian Wolff’s Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749). The presence of this notion raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen’s theoretical framework and the conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of Wolff’s notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen’s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion of civitas maxima in Kelsen’s Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen’s 1926 Lecture Course (‘Les Rapports de Système entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International’) at the l’Académie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.

AB - A significant part of Kelsen’s work is devoted to the theoretical and methodological separation of positive law from natural law. The predominant impression of this process is of a determination to entirely sunder the conceptual framework of positive law from any continuing reliance upon natural law. However, certain of Kelsen’s works involve the appropriation of the notion of civitas maxima from Christian Wolff’s Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1749). The presence of this notion raises the question of the relationship between Kelsen’s theoretical framework and the conception of natural law developed by Christian Wolff. It is through an examination of the transformation of Wolff’s notion of civitas maxima that an important aspect of Kelsen’s relationship to the natural law tradition becomes apparent. The appropriation will be traced through the initial discussion of civitas maxima in Kelsen’s Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag Zu Einer Reinen Rechtslehre (1920/1928), and its further exposition and development in Kelsen’s 1926 Lecture Course (‘Les Rapports de Système entre le Droit Interne et le Droit International’) at the l’Académie de droit international, in the Hague. In this manner, the significant methodological divergences between a Kelsenian theory of positive law, as a theory of legal monism according primacy to international law, and the Wolffian theory of natural law, as a theory of the law of nations, will become evident. This methodological divergence, however, should not obscure a more than residual affinity between Kelsen and Wolff concerning the cosmopolitical orientation of their thought.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9789004390386

T3 - Studies in Moral Philosophy

SP - 161

EP - 187

BT - Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition

A2 - Langford, Peter

A2 - Bryan, Ian

A2 - McGarry, John

PB - Brill

ER -