Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Governance requirements in supply chain finance

Electronic data

  • Phraknoi et al IJPDLM

    Accepted author manuscript, 883 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Governance requirements in supply chain finance: The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Governance requirements in supply chain finance: The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. / Phraknoi, Nichapa; Stevenson, Mark; Jia, Meng.
In: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 54, No. 3, 21.05.2024, p. 275-300.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Phraknoi, N, Stevenson, M & Jia, M 2024, 'Governance requirements in supply chain finance: The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary', International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2023-0134

APA

Phraknoi, N., Stevenson, M., & Jia, M. (2024). Governance requirements in supply chain finance: The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 54(3), 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2023-0134

Vancouver

Phraknoi N, Stevenson M, Jia M. Governance requirements in supply chain finance: The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 2024 May 21;54(3):275-300. Epub 2024 Apr 9. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2023-0134

Author

Phraknoi, Nichapa ; Stevenson, Mark ; Jia, Meng. / Governance requirements in supply chain finance : The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. In: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 2024 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 275-300.

Bibtex

@article{fe3a0afa8f134e7a8f011c499e58885b,
title = "Governance requirements in supply chain finance: The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary",
abstract = "AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to define and investigate the governance requirements of supply chain finance (SCF).Design/methodology/approachA qualitative analysis of 849 news articles published in UK newspapers (2000–2022) using the Gioia method.FindingsSCF governance relies on developing capacities for reflexive scrutiny at two stages: (1) prior to entering into an SCF relationship and (2) during its operation. Based on the notion of SCF as a complex adaptive system, we theorise SCF governance requirements as a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. The semipermeability of the two layers allows for a dynamic exchange between the SCF system and its environment. The first layer is the capacity to selectively enable or control the entry and access of certain actors and practices into the SCF system. The second layer is a capacity for ongoing scrutiny of the SCF operation and its development. Further, we identify five aspects of governance to be enabled, i.e. enhancing adaptability, building confidence, improving efficiency, advancing technology and promoting transparency; and four aspects to be controlled, i.e. preventing abuse of power, curbing fraud risk, constraining operational risk and restricting risky extensions to SCF practices.Practical implicationsOur dynamic framework can guide supply chain (SC) members in making decisions about whether to participate, or continue to operate, in an SCF relationship. Moreover, the findings have implications for policymakers and authorities who oversee entry/access and the involvement of SCF providers, particularly, fintech firms.Originality/valueThe study contributes to both the SC and governance literature by providing a systematic analysis of what SCF governance has to accomplish. Our novel contribution lies in its analysis of SCF governance based on a complex adaptive system approach, which expands the existing literature where SCF is described in rather static terms. More specifically, it suggests a need for a dynamic duality of SCF governance through the semipermeable boundary that selectively enables and controls certain SCF actors and practices.",
author = "Nichapa Phraknoi and Mark Stevenson and Meng Jia",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2023-0134",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "275--300",
journal = "International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management",
issn = "0960-0035",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance requirements in supply chain finance

T2 - The need for a dual-layered semipermeable boundary

AU - Phraknoi, Nichapa

AU - Stevenson, Mark

AU - Jia, Meng

PY - 2024/5/21

Y1 - 2024/5/21

N2 - AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to define and investigate the governance requirements of supply chain finance (SCF).Design/methodology/approachA qualitative analysis of 849 news articles published in UK newspapers (2000–2022) using the Gioia method.FindingsSCF governance relies on developing capacities for reflexive scrutiny at two stages: (1) prior to entering into an SCF relationship and (2) during its operation. Based on the notion of SCF as a complex adaptive system, we theorise SCF governance requirements as a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. The semipermeability of the two layers allows for a dynamic exchange between the SCF system and its environment. The first layer is the capacity to selectively enable or control the entry and access of certain actors and practices into the SCF system. The second layer is a capacity for ongoing scrutiny of the SCF operation and its development. Further, we identify five aspects of governance to be enabled, i.e. enhancing adaptability, building confidence, improving efficiency, advancing technology and promoting transparency; and four aspects to be controlled, i.e. preventing abuse of power, curbing fraud risk, constraining operational risk and restricting risky extensions to SCF practices.Practical implicationsOur dynamic framework can guide supply chain (SC) members in making decisions about whether to participate, or continue to operate, in an SCF relationship. Moreover, the findings have implications for policymakers and authorities who oversee entry/access and the involvement of SCF providers, particularly, fintech firms.Originality/valueThe study contributes to both the SC and governance literature by providing a systematic analysis of what SCF governance has to accomplish. Our novel contribution lies in its analysis of SCF governance based on a complex adaptive system approach, which expands the existing literature where SCF is described in rather static terms. More specifically, it suggests a need for a dynamic duality of SCF governance through the semipermeable boundary that selectively enables and controls certain SCF actors and practices.

AB - AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to define and investigate the governance requirements of supply chain finance (SCF).Design/methodology/approachA qualitative analysis of 849 news articles published in UK newspapers (2000–2022) using the Gioia method.FindingsSCF governance relies on developing capacities for reflexive scrutiny at two stages: (1) prior to entering into an SCF relationship and (2) during its operation. Based on the notion of SCF as a complex adaptive system, we theorise SCF governance requirements as a dual-layered semipermeable boundary. The semipermeability of the two layers allows for a dynamic exchange between the SCF system and its environment. The first layer is the capacity to selectively enable or control the entry and access of certain actors and practices into the SCF system. The second layer is a capacity for ongoing scrutiny of the SCF operation and its development. Further, we identify five aspects of governance to be enabled, i.e. enhancing adaptability, building confidence, improving efficiency, advancing technology and promoting transparency; and four aspects to be controlled, i.e. preventing abuse of power, curbing fraud risk, constraining operational risk and restricting risky extensions to SCF practices.Practical implicationsOur dynamic framework can guide supply chain (SC) members in making decisions about whether to participate, or continue to operate, in an SCF relationship. Moreover, the findings have implications for policymakers and authorities who oversee entry/access and the involvement of SCF providers, particularly, fintech firms.Originality/valueThe study contributes to both the SC and governance literature by providing a systematic analysis of what SCF governance has to accomplish. Our novel contribution lies in its analysis of SCF governance based on a complex adaptive system approach, which expands the existing literature where SCF is described in rather static terms. More specifically, it suggests a need for a dynamic duality of SCF governance through the semipermeable boundary that selectively enables and controls certain SCF actors and practices.

U2 - 10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2023-0134

DO - 10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2023-0134

M3 - Journal article

VL - 54

SP - 275

EP - 300

JO - International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management

JF - International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management

SN - 0960-0035

IS - 3

ER -