Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Guidelines and training initiatives that suppor...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Guidelines and training initiatives that support communication in cross-cultural primary-care settings: appraising their implementability using Normalization Process Theory

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • T. de Brun
  • M. O'reilly de-Brun
  • E. van Weel-Baumgarten
  • C. van Weel
  • C. Dowrick
  • C. Lionis
  • C.A. O'Donnell
  • N. Burns
  • F. S. Mair
  • A. Saridaki
  • M. Papadakaki
  • C. Princz
  • M. van den Muijsenbergh
  • A. MacFarlane
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/08/2015
<mark>Journal</mark>Family Practice
Issue number4
Volume32
Number of pages6
Pages (from-to)420-425
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date27/04/15
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background Guidelines and training initiatives (G/TIs) available to support communication in cross-cultural primary health care consultations are not routinely used. We need to understand more about levers and barriers to their implementation and identify G/TIs likely to be successfully implemented in practice.

Objective To report a mapping process used to identify G/TIs and to prospectively appraise their implementability, using Normalization Process Theory (NPT).

Methods RESTORE is a 4-year EU FP-7 project. We used purposeful and network sampling to identify experts in statutory and non-statutory agencies across Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, Scotland and the Netherlands who recommended G/TI data from the grey literature. In addition, a peer review of literature was conducted in each country. Resulting data were collated using a standardized Protocol Mapping Document. G/TIs were identified for inclusion by (i) initial elimination of incomplete G/TI material; (ii) application of filtering criteria; and (iii) application of NPT.

Results 20 G/TIs met selection criteria: 8 guidelines and 12 training initiatives. Most G/TIs were identified in the Netherlands (n = 7), followed by Ireland (n = 6) and England (n = 5). Fewer were identified in Scotland (n = 2), and none in Greece or Austria. The majority (n = 13) were generated without the inclusion of migrant service users. All 20 were prospectively appraised for potential implementability by applying NPT.

Conclusions NPT is useful as a means of prospectively testing G/TIs for implementability. Results indicate a need to initiate meaningful engagement of migrants in the development of G/TIs. A European-based professional standard for development and assessment of cross-cultural communication resources is advised.