Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19
View graph of relations

Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19: a changing relationship

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19: a changing relationship. / Ardovini, Lucia.
In: Global Discourse, Vol. 10, No. 4, 30.11.2020, p. 439-444.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ardovini L. Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19: a changing relationship. Global Discourse. 2020 Nov 30;10(4):439-444. Epub 2020 Oct 26. doi: 10.1332/204378920X16018995382058

Author

Ardovini, Lucia. / Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19 : a changing relationship. In: Global Discourse. 2020 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 439-444.

Bibtex

@article{ef3f1a5d7a0a4c6dbd5fd3f57dcf01e9,
title = "Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19: a changing relationship",
abstract = "This article focuses on the outbreak of COVID-19 in the Gulf and examines how different responses to the pandemic are affecting the relationship between state institutions and Islamist actors. Several states and regimes are attempting to contain the spread of COVID-19 by imposing increasingly authoritarian measures and tightening social control, which in turn is causing a renewed wave of social unrest. The article shows how, in this increasingly unstable context, the relationships between state institutions and Islamist actors are developing along two main trends.As a response to the pandemic, states in the Gulf are increasingly relying on the mobilisation of Islamic institutions and religious bodies to support lockdown and isolation policies, enlisting Islamic authority to compensate for the decreasing levels of popular trust in the regime. The tightening of authoritarian measures is bringing pre-existing tensions between Islamists and authorities back to the fore, resulting in an increased crackdown on religious opposition actors ad movements. This article shows that, while the extent to which these trends are developing depends on the national context under analysis, different state reactions to COVID-19 are already drastically altering the relationship between political institutions and Islamic ones, affecting both domestic and regional balances of power and highlighting the mutual dependency between religion and politics in the Gulf.",
keywords = "COVID-19, Gulf, Islamism, authoritarianism, political institutions, theocracy",
author = "Lucia Ardovini",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1332/204378920X16018995382058",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "439--444",
journal = "Global Discourse",
issn = "2326-9995",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gulf states and Islamist responses to COVID-19

T2 - a changing relationship

AU - Ardovini, Lucia

PY - 2020/11/30

Y1 - 2020/11/30

N2 - This article focuses on the outbreak of COVID-19 in the Gulf and examines how different responses to the pandemic are affecting the relationship between state institutions and Islamist actors. Several states and regimes are attempting to contain the spread of COVID-19 by imposing increasingly authoritarian measures and tightening social control, which in turn is causing a renewed wave of social unrest. The article shows how, in this increasingly unstable context, the relationships between state institutions and Islamist actors are developing along two main trends.As a response to the pandemic, states in the Gulf are increasingly relying on the mobilisation of Islamic institutions and religious bodies to support lockdown and isolation policies, enlisting Islamic authority to compensate for the decreasing levels of popular trust in the regime. The tightening of authoritarian measures is bringing pre-existing tensions between Islamists and authorities back to the fore, resulting in an increased crackdown on religious opposition actors ad movements. This article shows that, while the extent to which these trends are developing depends on the national context under analysis, different state reactions to COVID-19 are already drastically altering the relationship between political institutions and Islamic ones, affecting both domestic and regional balances of power and highlighting the mutual dependency between religion and politics in the Gulf.

AB - This article focuses on the outbreak of COVID-19 in the Gulf and examines how different responses to the pandemic are affecting the relationship between state institutions and Islamist actors. Several states and regimes are attempting to contain the spread of COVID-19 by imposing increasingly authoritarian measures and tightening social control, which in turn is causing a renewed wave of social unrest. The article shows how, in this increasingly unstable context, the relationships between state institutions and Islamist actors are developing along two main trends.As a response to the pandemic, states in the Gulf are increasingly relying on the mobilisation of Islamic institutions and religious bodies to support lockdown and isolation policies, enlisting Islamic authority to compensate for the decreasing levels of popular trust in the regime. The tightening of authoritarian measures is bringing pre-existing tensions between Islamists and authorities back to the fore, resulting in an increased crackdown on religious opposition actors ad movements. This article shows that, while the extent to which these trends are developing depends on the national context under analysis, different state reactions to COVID-19 are already drastically altering the relationship between political institutions and Islamic ones, affecting both domestic and regional balances of power and highlighting the mutual dependency between religion and politics in the Gulf.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Gulf

KW - Islamism

KW - authoritarianism

KW - political institutions

KW - theocracy

U2 - 10.1332/204378920X16018995382058

DO - 10.1332/204378920X16018995382058

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 439

EP - 444

JO - Global Discourse

JF - Global Discourse

SN - 2326-9995

IS - 4

ER -