Accepted author manuscript, 819 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hold big business to task on ecosystem restoration
T2 - Corporate reporting must embrace holistic principles from restoration science
AU - Lamont, Timothy
AU - Barlow, Jos
AU - Bebbington, Jan
AU - Cuckston, Thomas
AU - Djohani, Rili
AU - Garrett, Rachael
AU - Jones, Holly
AU - Razak, Tries B.
AU - Graham, Nick
PY - 2023/9/7
Y1 - 2023/9/7
N2 - Large transnational corporations (TNCs) could use their considerable finances, labor, manufacturing infrastructure, and logistics expertise to play key roles in upscaling ecosystem restoration efforts, which are vital for achieving global biodiversity, climate, and development targets (1, 2). Many TNCs are positioning themselves as environmental leaders, carrying out restoration that goes far beyond legal obligations to offset their own environmental impacts. This promise of corporate-led progress is alluring, and has delivered benefits in some cases, but is also fraught with risks. Well-intentioned efforts can do more harm than good (3), and some corporations oversell their efforts for reputational enhancement (greenwashing). Our evaluation of sustainability reports of 100 of the world’s largest businesses reveals the extent to which TNCs are claiming to contribute to—but failing to report on—ecosystem restoration. Increased rigor, consistency, transparency, and accountability are needed to ensure that corporate-led restoration delivers quantifiable, beneficial, and equitable outcomes.
AB - Large transnational corporations (TNCs) could use their considerable finances, labor, manufacturing infrastructure, and logistics expertise to play key roles in upscaling ecosystem restoration efforts, which are vital for achieving global biodiversity, climate, and development targets (1, 2). Many TNCs are positioning themselves as environmental leaders, carrying out restoration that goes far beyond legal obligations to offset their own environmental impacts. This promise of corporate-led progress is alluring, and has delivered benefits in some cases, but is also fraught with risks. Well-intentioned efforts can do more harm than good (3), and some corporations oversell their efforts for reputational enhancement (greenwashing). Our evaluation of sustainability reports of 100 of the world’s largest businesses reveals the extent to which TNCs are claiming to contribute to—but failing to report on—ecosystem restoration. Increased rigor, consistency, transparency, and accountability are needed to ensure that corporate-led restoration delivers quantifiable, beneficial, and equitable outcomes.
U2 - 10.1126/science.adh2610
DO - 10.1126/science.adh2610
M3 - Journal article
VL - 381
SP - 1053
EP - 1055
JO - Science
JF - Science
SN - 0036-8075
IS - 6662
ER -