Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How children and adults value different animal ...

Electronic data

  • How children and adults value different animal lives - May 10 Accepted Author Manuscript

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

    Accepted author manuscript, 994 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

How children and adults value different animal lives

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

How children and adults value different animal lives. / Henseler Kozachenko, Heather; Piazza, Jared.
In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 210, 105204, 31.10.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Henseler Kozachenko H, Piazza J. How children and adults value different animal lives. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2021 Oct 31;210:105204. Epub 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

Author

Henseler Kozachenko, Heather ; Piazza, Jared. / How children and adults value different animal lives. In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2021 ; Vol. 210.

Bibtex

@article{28af665789ff4f259efc0005fd5b8807,
title = "How children and adults value different animal lives",
abstract = "The current study modeled the attributions underlying moral con- cern for animals during childhood and adulthood with the aim of better understanding how concern for animals develops. In total, 241 children aged 6–10 years and 152 adults appraised a range of animals on seven appraisal dimensions and, subsequently rank-ordered which animals they would save in a medicine allocation task. Structural equation modeling revealed several developmental continuities and discontinuities in the dimensions children and adults used to evaluate animal lives. Whereas participants of all ages valued animals based on their aesthetic qualities, intelligence, and perceived similarity to humans, younger children valued animal aesthetics most of all. They also valued benevolence in animals more than older children and adults. Only older children and adults comprehended and valued animals on the basis of their utility as food for humans. Furthermore, neither younger nor older children grasped the role of sentience in the valuation of animals. Only adults factored sentience into their view of what makes animals similar to humans and worthy of moral concern. The results highlight the ways in which moral concern for animals changes across development in several important respects, reflecting an increasingly human-centric orientation.",
keywords = "Animals, Moral concern, Attribution, Value judgements, Moral standing, Speciesism",
author = "{Henseler Kozachenko}, Heather and Jared Piazza",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204",
language = "English",
volume = "210",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "ELSEVIER ACADEMIC PRESS INC",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How children and adults value different animal lives

AU - Henseler Kozachenko, Heather

AU - Piazza, Jared

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

PY - 2021/10/31

Y1 - 2021/10/31

N2 - The current study modeled the attributions underlying moral con- cern for animals during childhood and adulthood with the aim of better understanding how concern for animals develops. In total, 241 children aged 6–10 years and 152 adults appraised a range of animals on seven appraisal dimensions and, subsequently rank-ordered which animals they would save in a medicine allocation task. Structural equation modeling revealed several developmental continuities and discontinuities in the dimensions children and adults used to evaluate animal lives. Whereas participants of all ages valued animals based on their aesthetic qualities, intelligence, and perceived similarity to humans, younger children valued animal aesthetics most of all. They also valued benevolence in animals more than older children and adults. Only older children and adults comprehended and valued animals on the basis of their utility as food for humans. Furthermore, neither younger nor older children grasped the role of sentience in the valuation of animals. Only adults factored sentience into their view of what makes animals similar to humans and worthy of moral concern. The results highlight the ways in which moral concern for animals changes across development in several important respects, reflecting an increasingly human-centric orientation.

AB - The current study modeled the attributions underlying moral con- cern for animals during childhood and adulthood with the aim of better understanding how concern for animals develops. In total, 241 children aged 6–10 years and 152 adults appraised a range of animals on seven appraisal dimensions and, subsequently rank-ordered which animals they would save in a medicine allocation task. Structural equation modeling revealed several developmental continuities and discontinuities in the dimensions children and adults used to evaluate animal lives. Whereas participants of all ages valued animals based on their aesthetic qualities, intelligence, and perceived similarity to humans, younger children valued animal aesthetics most of all. They also valued benevolence in animals more than older children and adults. Only older children and adults comprehended and valued animals on the basis of their utility as food for humans. Furthermore, neither younger nor older children grasped the role of sentience in the valuation of animals. Only adults factored sentience into their view of what makes animals similar to humans and worthy of moral concern. The results highlight the ways in which moral concern for animals changes across development in several important respects, reflecting an increasingly human-centric orientation.

KW - Animals

KW - Moral concern

KW - Attribution

KW - Value judgements

KW - Moral standing

KW - Speciesism

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

M3 - Journal article

VL - 210

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

M1 - 105204

ER -