Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How Does the Proportion of Never Treatment Infl...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

How Does the Proportion of Never Treatment Influence the Success of Mass Drug Administration Programs for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
  • Klodeta Kura
  • Wilma A Stolk
  • Maria-Gloria Basáñez
  • Benjamin S Collyer
  • Sake J de Vlas
  • Peter J Diggle
  • Katherine Gass
  • Matthew Graham
  • T Déirdre Hollingsworth
  • Jonathan D King
  • Alison Krentel
  • Roy M Anderson
  • Luc E Coffeng
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>25/04/2024
<mark>Journal</mark>Clinical Infectious Diseases
Issue numberSuppl. 2
Volume78
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)S93-S100
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background Mass drug administration (MDA) is the cornerstone for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF). The proportion of the population that is never treated (NT) is a crucial determinant of whether this goal is achieved within reasonable time frames. Methods Using 2 individual-based stochastic LF transmission models, we assess the maximum permissible level of NT for which the 1% microfilaremia (mf) prevalence threshold can be achieved (with 90% probability) within 10 years under different scenarios of annual MDA coverage, drug combination and transmission setting. Results For Anopheles-transmission settings, we find that treating 80% of the eligible population annually with ivermectin + albendazole (IA) can achieve the 1% mf prevalence threshold within 10 years of annual treatment when baseline mf prevalence is 10%, as long as NT &lt;10%. Higher proportions of NT are acceptable when more efficacious treatment regimens are used. For Culex-transmission settings with a low (5%) baseline mf prevalence and diethylcarbamazine + albendazole (DA) or ivermectin + diethylcarbamazine + albendazole (IDA) treatment, elimination can be reached if treatment coverage among eligibles is 80% or higher. For 10% baseline mf prevalence, the target can be achieved when the annual coverage is 80% and NT ≤15%. Higher infection prevalence or levels of NT would make achieving the target more difficult. Conclusions The proportion of people never treated in MDA programmes for LF can strongly influence the achievement of elimination and the impact of NT is greater in high transmission areas. This study provides a starting point for further development of criteria for the evaluation of NT.