Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology on 22/12/2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01694243.2020.1861859
Accepted author manuscript, 2.04 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid and adhesively bonded joints with dissimilar adherends
T2 - a critical review
AU - Yousefi Kanani, Armin
AU - Green, Sarah
AU - Hou, Xiaonan
AU - Ye, Jianqiao
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology on 22/12/2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01694243.2020.1861859
PY - 2021/9/30
Y1 - 2021/9/30
N2 - This paper reviews the reported literature on dissimilar (non-matched adherend) adhesively bonded joints (ABJs), currently used bonding processes, and the mechanisms by which these types of joints fail when subjected to structural loading and environmental conditions. Additionally, approaches to improve the performance of dissimilar ABJs, through geometrical and material modifications, are also discussed. Many studies have reported on the strength and failure behaviours of adhesively bonded joints, but of those, few have reported on the performance of dissimilar ABJs. Unlike matched ABJs, the absence of accepted design approaches for dissimilar ABJs arises from their inherent inhomogeneity, which introduces complexities in load transfer mechanisms, in the distribution of stresses through the joint, and in the mechanisms by which the joint ultimately fails. Several authors have proposed approaches to improve the performance of adhesively bonded joints, variously through geometrical or material modification means, but there remains unmet research needs to better understand novel dissimilar ABJ designs.
AB - This paper reviews the reported literature on dissimilar (non-matched adherend) adhesively bonded joints (ABJs), currently used bonding processes, and the mechanisms by which these types of joints fail when subjected to structural loading and environmental conditions. Additionally, approaches to improve the performance of dissimilar ABJs, through geometrical and material modifications, are also discussed. Many studies have reported on the strength and failure behaviours of adhesively bonded joints, but of those, few have reported on the performance of dissimilar ABJs. Unlike matched ABJs, the absence of accepted design approaches for dissimilar ABJs arises from their inherent inhomogeneity, which introduces complexities in load transfer mechanisms, in the distribution of stresses through the joint, and in the mechanisms by which the joint ultimately fails. Several authors have proposed approaches to improve the performance of adhesively bonded joints, variously through geometrical or material modification means, but there remains unmet research needs to better understand novel dissimilar ABJ designs.
KW - Adhesive joint
KW - Dissimilar adherends
KW - Hybrid joint
KW - Environmental durability
KW - Impact
U2 - 10.1080/01694243.2020.1861859
DO - 10.1080/01694243.2020.1861859
M3 - Review article
VL - 35
SP - 1821
EP - 1859
JO - Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
JF - Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
SN - 1568-5616
IS - 17
ER -