Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Improving regional care in the last year of lif...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • On behalf of The CoRe‑Net Co‑applicants
Close
Article numbere035988
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/11/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>BMJ Open
Issue number11
Volume10
Number of pages10
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Objectives: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. Design: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. Setting: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. Participants: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. Results: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). Conclusions: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. Trial registration number: DRKS00011925.