Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle
T2 - results from a cross-sectional survey
AU - On behalf of The CoRe‑Net Co‑applicants
AU - Voltz, Raymond
AU - Dust, Gloria
AU - Schippel, Nicolas
AU - Hamacher, Stefanie
AU - Payne, Sheila
AU - Scholten, Nadine
AU - Pfaff, Holger
AU - Rietz, Christian
AU - Strupp, Julia
AU - Albus, Christian
AU - Ansmann, Lena
AU - Jessen, Frank
AU - Karbach, Ute
AU - Kuntz, Ludwig
AU - Schubert, Ingrid
AU - Schulz-Nieswandt, Frank
AU - Stock, Stephanie
PY - 2020/11/30
Y1 - 2020/11/30
N2 - Objectives: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. Design: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. Setting: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. Participants: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. Results: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). Conclusions: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. Trial registration number: DRKS00011925.
AB - Objectives: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. Design: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. Setting: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. Participants: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. Results: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). Conclusions: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. Trial registration number: DRKS00011925.
KW - Health services research
KW - 1506
KW - 1704
KW - adult palliative care
KW - quality in health care
KW - change management
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988
M3 - Journal article
VL - 10
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
SN - 2044-6055
IS - 11
M1 - e035988
ER -