Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Improving regional care in the last year of lif...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey. / On behalf of The CoRe‑Net Co‑applicants.
In: BMJ Open, Vol. 10, No. 11, e035988, 30.11.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

On behalf of The CoRe‑Net Co‑applicants. Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e035988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988

Author

Bibtex

@article{668024c3eb634ee7a74423b17bc9b35e,
title = "Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey",
abstract = "Objectives: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. Design: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. Setting: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. Participants: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. Results: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as {\textquoteleft}not sensitive{\textquoteright}. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% {\textquoteleft}good{\textquoteright}) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% {\textquoteleft}good{\textquoteright}). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). Conclusions: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. Trial registration number: DRKS00011925.",
keywords = "Health services research, 1506, 1704, adult palliative care, quality in health care, change management",
author = "{On behalf of The CoRe‑Net Co‑applicants} and Raymond Voltz and Gloria Dust and Nicolas Schippel and Stefanie Hamacher and Sheila Payne and Nadine Scholten and Holger Pfaff and Christian Rietz and Julia Strupp and Christian Albus and Lena Ansmann and Frank Jessen and Ute Karbach and Ludwig Kuntz and Ingrid Schubert and Frank Schulz-Nieswandt and Stephanie Stock",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle

T2 - results from a cross-sectional survey

AU - On behalf of The CoRe‑Net Co‑applicants

AU - Voltz, Raymond

AU - Dust, Gloria

AU - Schippel, Nicolas

AU - Hamacher, Stefanie

AU - Payne, Sheila

AU - Scholten, Nadine

AU - Pfaff, Holger

AU - Rietz, Christian

AU - Strupp, Julia

AU - Albus, Christian

AU - Ansmann, Lena

AU - Jessen, Frank

AU - Karbach, Ute

AU - Kuntz, Ludwig

AU - Schubert, Ingrid

AU - Schulz-Nieswandt, Frank

AU - Stock, Stephanie

PY - 2020/11/30

Y1 - 2020/11/30

N2 - Objectives: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. Design: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. Setting: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. Participants: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. Results: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). Conclusions: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. Trial registration number: DRKS00011925.

AB - Objectives: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. Design: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. Setting: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. Participants: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. Results: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). Conclusions: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. Trial registration number: DRKS00011925.

KW - Health services research

KW - 1506

KW - 1704

KW - adult palliative care

KW - quality in health care

KW - change management

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 11

M1 - e035988

ER -