Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Sara Fovargue and Mary Neal ‘IN GOOD CONSCIENCE’: CONSCIENCE-BASED EXEMPTIONS AND PROPER MEDICAL TREATMENT Med Law Rev 2015 23: 221-241. is available online at: http://medlaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/2/221.abstract
Accepted author manuscript, 219 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - In good conscience
T2 - conscience-based exemptions and proper medical treatment
AU - Fovargue, Sara
AU - Neal, Mary
N1 - Date of Acceptance: 06/03/15 This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Sara Fovargue and Mary Neal ‘IN GOOD CONSCIENCE’: CONSCIENCE-BASED EXEMPTIONS AND PROPER MEDICAL TREATMENT Med Law Rev 2015 23: 221-241. is available online at: http://medlaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/2/221.abstract
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Lack of clarity about the proper limits of conscientious refusal to participate in particular healthcare practices has given rise to fears that, in the absence of clear parameters, conscientious exemptions may become increasingly widespread, leading to intolerable burdens on practitioners, patients, colleagues and institutions. Here, after explaining our understanding of conscience and setting out a defence of the role of conscience based exemptions in healthcare, we identify three restricting factors which clarify the proper scope of such exemptions. First, we identify the territorial extent of conscience-based exemptions as being the margins of proper medical treatment, and argue that such exemptions are appropriate only where treatment has a liminal status. Secondly, we clarify the criteria for conscientiousness and, finally, we consider the conditions under which any valid conscience-based exemption must operate. These clarifications should help to reassure those worried that recognising rights of conscience at all inevitably risks rampant subjectivity and self-interest on the part of professionals. At the same time, the restricting factors we identify also have the effect of delineating a very robust conscience zone. Where a conscience claim relates to treatment of liminal status and satisfies the criteria for conscientious character, as well as the conditions for conscientious performance, it deserves very muscular legal protection indeed.
AB - Lack of clarity about the proper limits of conscientious refusal to participate in particular healthcare practices has given rise to fears that, in the absence of clear parameters, conscientious exemptions may become increasingly widespread, leading to intolerable burdens on practitioners, patients, colleagues and institutions. Here, after explaining our understanding of conscience and setting out a defence of the role of conscience based exemptions in healthcare, we identify three restricting factors which clarify the proper scope of such exemptions. First, we identify the territorial extent of conscience-based exemptions as being the margins of proper medical treatment, and argue that such exemptions are appropriate only where treatment has a liminal status. Secondly, we clarify the criteria for conscientiousness and, finally, we consider the conditions under which any valid conscience-based exemption must operate. These clarifications should help to reassure those worried that recognising rights of conscience at all inevitably risks rampant subjectivity and self-interest on the part of professionals. At the same time, the restricting factors we identify also have the effect of delineating a very robust conscience zone. Where a conscience claim relates to treatment of liminal status and satisfies the criteria for conscientious character, as well as the conditions for conscientious performance, it deserves very muscular legal protection indeed.
KW - conscience
KW - conscientious objection
KW - conscience-based exemptions
KW - proper medical treatment
KW - professional obligations
KW - professional ethics
U2 - 10.1093/medlaw/fwv007
DO - 10.1093/medlaw/fwv007
M3 - Journal article
VL - 23
SP - 221
EP - 241
JO - Medical Law Review
JF - Medical Law Review
SN - 0967-0742
IS - 2
ER -