Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Incorporating data received after a sequential ...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods. / Whitehead, John; Bollard, Kim; Matsushita, Tatsuru et al.
In: Biometrics, Vol. 59, No. 3, 09.2003, p. 701-709.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Whitehead, J, Bollard, K, Matsushita, T, Sooriyarachchi, MR & Whitehead, A 2003, 'Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods.', Biometrics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00081

APA

Whitehead, J., Bollard, K., Matsushita, T., Sooriyarachchi, M. R., & Whitehead, A. (2003). Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods. Biometrics, 59(3), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00081

Vancouver

Whitehead J, Bollard K, Matsushita T, Sooriyarachchi MR, Whitehead A. Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods. Biometrics. 2003 Sept;59(3):701-709. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00081

Author

Whitehead, John ; Bollard, Kim ; Matsushita, Tatsuru et al. / Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods. In: Biometrics. 2003 ; Vol. 59, No. 3. pp. 701-709.

Bibtex

@article{df2ce975be1d445aa1b0b9ef3a378747,
title = "Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods.",
abstract = "In a sequential clinical trial, accrual of data on patients often continues after the stopping criterion for the study has been met. This is termed {"}overrunning.{"} Overrunning occurs mainly when the primary response from each patient is measured after some extended observation period. The objective of this article is to compare two methods of allowing for overrunning. In particular, simulation studies are reported that assess the two procedures in terms of how well they maintain the intended type I error rate. The effect on power resulting from the incorporation of {"}overrunning data{"} using the two procedures is evaluated.",
author = "John Whitehead and Kim Bollard and Tatsuru Matsushita and Sooriyarachchi, {Marina Roshini} and Anne Whitehead",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Statistics and Operational Research",
year = "2003",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/1541-0420.00081",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "701--709",
journal = "Biometrics",
issn = "1541-0420",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods.

AU - Whitehead, John

AU - Bollard, Kim

AU - Matsushita, Tatsuru

AU - Sooriyarachchi, Marina Roshini

AU - Whitehead, Anne

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Statistics and Operational Research

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - In a sequential clinical trial, accrual of data on patients often continues after the stopping criterion for the study has been met. This is termed "overrunning." Overrunning occurs mainly when the primary response from each patient is measured after some extended observation period. The objective of this article is to compare two methods of allowing for overrunning. In particular, simulation studies are reported that assess the two procedures in terms of how well they maintain the intended type I error rate. The effect on power resulting from the incorporation of "overrunning data" using the two procedures is evaluated.

AB - In a sequential clinical trial, accrual of data on patients often continues after the stopping criterion for the study has been met. This is termed "overrunning." Overrunning occurs mainly when the primary response from each patient is measured after some extended observation period. The objective of this article is to compare two methods of allowing for overrunning. In particular, simulation studies are reported that assess the two procedures in terms of how well they maintain the intended type I error rate. The effect on power resulting from the incorporation of "overrunning data" using the two procedures is evaluated.

U2 - 10.1111/1541-0420.00081

DO - 10.1111/1541-0420.00081

M3 - Journal article

VL - 59

SP - 701

EP - 709

JO - Biometrics

JF - Biometrics

SN - 1541-0420

IS - 3

ER -