Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials

Research

Keywords

View graph of relations

Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials: An Attitude Problem?

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter

Published

Standard

Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials: An Attitude Problem? / Willmott, Dominic; Boduszek, Daniel; Debowska, Agata et al.
Forensic Psychology. ed. / David A. Crighton; Graham J. Towl. 3rd ed. ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2021. p. 94-119.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter

Harvard

Willmott, D, Boduszek, D, Debowska, A & Hudspith, LF 2021, Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials: An Attitude Problem? in DA Crighton & GJ Towl (eds), Forensic Psychology. 3rd ed. edn, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 94-119.

APA

Willmott, D., Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., & Hudspith, L. F. (2021). Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials: An Attitude Problem? In D. A. Crighton, & G. J. Towl (Eds.), Forensic Psychology (3rd ed. ed., pp. 94-119). Wiley.

Vancouver

Willmott D, Boduszek D, Debowska A, Hudspith LF. Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials: An Attitude Problem? In Crighton DA, Towl GJ, editors, Forensic Psychology. 3rd ed. ed. Chichester: Wiley. 2021. p. 94-119

Author

Willmott, Dominic ; Boduszek, Daniel ; Debowska, Agata et al. / Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials : An Attitude Problem?. Forensic Psychology. editor / David A. Crighton ; Graham J. Towl. 3rd ed. ed. Chichester : Wiley, 2021. pp. 94-119

Bibtex

@inbook{5443fc191aad49a5a87d91005cb34341,
title = "Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials: An Attitude Problem?",
abstract = "Steeped in tradition and historical significance, criminal justice systems throughout the world have long considered jury trials an essential feature of a fair and just due process. Despite vast procedural variation between jurisdictions and long-established criticisms surrounding the use of lay participation within legal disputes juries continue to be utilised in some format in more than forty countries across the world (see Kaplan & Martin, 2013). Today jury trials account for just a small proportion of criminal cases that are heard before a court (approximately 1% in England and Wales), though in recent decades some countries have sought to introduce the approach within their legal systems. Japan, South Korea and Russia all now make use of lay decision makers in some way and most recently Argentina introduced jury trials for serious criminal cases (Hans, 2008; 2017).",
keywords = "Rape myths, Jury Decision-Making, sexual assault",
author = "Dominic Willmott and Daniel Boduszek and Agata Debowska and Hudspith, {Lara Flynn}",
year = "2021",
month = may,
day = "24",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781119673545",
pages = "94--119",
editor = "Crighton, {David A.} and Towl, {Graham J.}",
booktitle = "Forensic Psychology",
publisher = "Wiley",
edition = "3rd ed.",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Jury Decision-making in Rape Trials

T2 - An Attitude Problem?

AU - Willmott, Dominic

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Debowska, Agata

AU - Hudspith, Lara Flynn

PY - 2021/5/24

Y1 - 2021/5/24

N2 - Steeped in tradition and historical significance, criminal justice systems throughout the world have long considered jury trials an essential feature of a fair and just due process. Despite vast procedural variation between jurisdictions and long-established criticisms surrounding the use of lay participation within legal disputes juries continue to be utilised in some format in more than forty countries across the world (see Kaplan & Martin, 2013). Today jury trials account for just a small proportion of criminal cases that are heard before a court (approximately 1% in England and Wales), though in recent decades some countries have sought to introduce the approach within their legal systems. Japan, South Korea and Russia all now make use of lay decision makers in some way and most recently Argentina introduced jury trials for serious criminal cases (Hans, 2008; 2017).

AB - Steeped in tradition and historical significance, criminal justice systems throughout the world have long considered jury trials an essential feature of a fair and just due process. Despite vast procedural variation between jurisdictions and long-established criticisms surrounding the use of lay participation within legal disputes juries continue to be utilised in some format in more than forty countries across the world (see Kaplan & Martin, 2013). Today jury trials account for just a small proportion of criminal cases that are heard before a court (approximately 1% in England and Wales), though in recent decades some countries have sought to introduce the approach within their legal systems. Japan, South Korea and Russia all now make use of lay decision makers in some way and most recently Argentina introduced jury trials for serious criminal cases (Hans, 2008; 2017).

KW - Rape myths

KW - Jury Decision-Making

KW - sexual assault

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781119673545

SP - 94

EP - 119

BT - Forensic Psychology

A2 - Crighton, David A.

A2 - Towl, Graham J.

PB - Wiley

CY - Chichester

ER -