Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities: Can the Capabilities Approach Help Decolonise the Curriculum?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities: Can the Capabilities Approach Help Decolonise the Curriculum? / Talbot, Daniel.
In: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 24, No. 2, 30.06.2023, p. 216-233.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Talbot D. Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities: Can the Capabilities Approach Help Decolonise the Curriculum? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2023 Jun 30;24(2):216-233. Epub 2023 Apr 18. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2023.2200240

Author

Talbot, Daniel. / Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities : Can the Capabilities Approach Help Decolonise the Curriculum?. In: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2023 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 216-233.

Bibtex

@article{506d13dfffc6484bba8fd461f6399cae,
title = "Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities: Can the Capabilities Approach Help Decolonise the Curriculum?",
abstract = "The Capabilities Approach and the movement to Decolonise the Curriculum contain powerful intellectual and practical possibilities for changing the way societies conceive of education and its purpose. The former presents a bold set of educational aims offering an alternative to market-driven human capital approaches. The latter seeks to undo the legacy of colonialism that still echoes through classrooms across the world. Yet, despite potential affinities, little work exists exploring the compatibility of their respective theoretical commitments. This article argues that, behind the label Decolonise the Curriculum, lies a spectrum of approaches that, at their polar ends, risk becoming counterproductive in the search for educational justice. Articulating a version of Decolonising the Curriculum that avoids these pitfalls can be achieved through the theoretical insights of the Capabilities Approach and, in particular, the writings of its architects, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum.",
keywords = "Development",
author = "Daniel Talbot",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/19452829.2023.2200240",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "216--233",
journal = "Journal of Human Development and Capabilities",
issn = "1945-2829",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge, Knowers, and Capabilities

T2 - Can the Capabilities Approach Help Decolonise the Curriculum?

AU - Talbot, Daniel

PY - 2023/6/30

Y1 - 2023/6/30

N2 - The Capabilities Approach and the movement to Decolonise the Curriculum contain powerful intellectual and practical possibilities for changing the way societies conceive of education and its purpose. The former presents a bold set of educational aims offering an alternative to market-driven human capital approaches. The latter seeks to undo the legacy of colonialism that still echoes through classrooms across the world. Yet, despite potential affinities, little work exists exploring the compatibility of their respective theoretical commitments. This article argues that, behind the label Decolonise the Curriculum, lies a spectrum of approaches that, at their polar ends, risk becoming counterproductive in the search for educational justice. Articulating a version of Decolonising the Curriculum that avoids these pitfalls can be achieved through the theoretical insights of the Capabilities Approach and, in particular, the writings of its architects, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum.

AB - The Capabilities Approach and the movement to Decolonise the Curriculum contain powerful intellectual and practical possibilities for changing the way societies conceive of education and its purpose. The former presents a bold set of educational aims offering an alternative to market-driven human capital approaches. The latter seeks to undo the legacy of colonialism that still echoes through classrooms across the world. Yet, despite potential affinities, little work exists exploring the compatibility of their respective theoretical commitments. This article argues that, behind the label Decolonise the Curriculum, lies a spectrum of approaches that, at their polar ends, risk becoming counterproductive in the search for educational justice. Articulating a version of Decolonising the Curriculum that avoids these pitfalls can be achieved through the theoretical insights of the Capabilities Approach and, in particular, the writings of its architects, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum.

KW - Development

U2 - 10.1080/19452829.2023.2200240

DO - 10.1080/19452829.2023.2200240

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 216

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

JF - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

SN - 1945-2829

IS - 2

ER -