Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Libel in the Provinces

Electronic data

  • Egan-edited-for-author

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Past and Present following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Clare Egan, Libel in the Provinces: Disinformation and ‘Disreputation’ in Early Modern England, Past & Present, Volume 257, Issue Supplement_16, November 2022, Pages 75–110, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtac030 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/past/article/257/Supplement_16/75/6782264

    Accepted author manuscript, 382 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 31/10/24

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Libel in the Provinces: Disinformation and ‘Disreputation’ in Early Modern England

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/10/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Past and Present
Issue numberSupplement_16
Volume257
Number of pages36
Pages (from-to)75-110
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

By the early modern period, libelling a private individual had been legally redefined and was being tried at the court of Star Chamber, alongside cases relating to the monarch or government. This brought the ruination of individual reputations by spreading false rumours into the same realm as the circulation of nationally significant false news. Private libels typically took the form of verses, impersonations, mock ceremonies or visual symbols that were read, sung, posted, and published; they exploited the defamatory potential of fictional reconstructions of local disputes in order to exacerbate conflicts within provincial communities. This chapter argues that private libels provide evidence for a novel multimedia practice of circulating disinformation that blended fact and fiction amongst the social networks of early modern England. It examines two cases, one centred upon a libellous verse and the other on mock proclamations, to establish the significance of literary and performance techniques in libellous disinformation. The chapter also explores the significance of ‘disreputation’ for the categories of private and public. It argues that private libels were a crucial feature of the social backdrop to established forms of oral, print and manuscript communication, which impacted upon common perceptions of trustworthiness of information and public official figures.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Past and Present following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Clare Egan, Libel in the Provinces: Disinformation and ‘Disreputation’ in Early Modern England, Past & Present, Volume 257, Issue Supplement_16, November 2022, Pages 75–110, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtac030 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/past/article/257/Supplement_16/75/6782264