Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Past and Present following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Clare Egan, Libel in the Provinces: Disinformation and ‘Disreputation’ in Early Modern England, Past & Present, Volume 257, Issue Supplement_16, November 2022, Pages 75–110, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtac030 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/past/article/257/Supplement_16/75/6782264
Accepted author manuscript, 382 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Libel in the Provinces
T2 - Disinformation and ‘Disreputation’ in Early Modern England
AU - Egan, Clare
N1 - This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Past and Present following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Clare Egan, Libel in the Provinces: Disinformation and ‘Disreputation’ in Early Modern England, Past & Present, Volume 257, Issue Supplement_16, November 2022, Pages 75–110, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtac030 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/past/article/257/Supplement_16/75/6782264
PY - 2022/10/31
Y1 - 2022/10/31
N2 - By the early modern period, libelling a private individual had been legally redefined and was being tried at the court of Star Chamber, alongside cases relating to the monarch or government. This brought the ruination of individual reputations by spreading false rumours into the same realm as the circulation of nationally significant false news. Private libels typically took the form of verses, impersonations, mock ceremonies or visual symbols that were read, sung, posted, and published; they exploited the defamatory potential of fictional reconstructions of local disputes in order to exacerbate conflicts within provincial communities. This chapter argues that private libels provide evidence for a novel multimedia practice of circulating disinformation that blended fact and fiction amongst the social networks of early modern England. It examines two cases, one centred upon a libellous verse and the other on mock proclamations, to establish the significance of literary and performance techniques in libellous disinformation. The chapter also explores the significance of ‘disreputation’ for the categories of private and public. It argues that private libels were a crucial feature of the social backdrop to established forms of oral, print and manuscript communication, which impacted upon common perceptions of trustworthiness of information and public official figures.
AB - By the early modern period, libelling a private individual had been legally redefined and was being tried at the court of Star Chamber, alongside cases relating to the monarch or government. This brought the ruination of individual reputations by spreading false rumours into the same realm as the circulation of nationally significant false news. Private libels typically took the form of verses, impersonations, mock ceremonies or visual symbols that were read, sung, posted, and published; they exploited the defamatory potential of fictional reconstructions of local disputes in order to exacerbate conflicts within provincial communities. This chapter argues that private libels provide evidence for a novel multimedia practice of circulating disinformation that blended fact and fiction amongst the social networks of early modern England. It examines two cases, one centred upon a libellous verse and the other on mock proclamations, to establish the significance of literary and performance techniques in libellous disinformation. The chapter also explores the significance of ‘disreputation’ for the categories of private and public. It argues that private libels were a crucial feature of the social backdrop to established forms of oral, print and manuscript communication, which impacted upon common perceptions of trustworthiness of information and public official figures.
KW - History
KW - Cultural Studies
U2 - 10.1093/pastj/gtac030
DO - 10.1093/pastj/gtac030
M3 - Journal article
VL - 257
SP - 75
EP - 110
JO - Past and Present
JF - Past and Present
SN - 0031-2746
IS - Supplement_16
ER -