Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making sense of landscape change
View graph of relations

Making sense of landscape change: long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Making sense of landscape change: long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration. / Westling, Emma; Surridge, Ben; Sharp, Liz et al.
In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 519, No. Part C, 27.11.2014, p. 2613-2623.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Westling E, Surridge B, Sharp L, Lerner D. Making sense of landscape change: long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration. Journal of Hydrology. 2014 Nov 27;519(Part C):2613-2623. Epub 2014 Sept 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.029

Author

Westling, Emma ; Surridge, Ben ; Sharp, Liz et al. / Making sense of landscape change : long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2014 ; Vol. 519, No. Part C. pp. 2613-2623.

Bibtex

@article{80db76437ae84018a1b86d7a6a7757ca,
title = "Making sense of landscape change: long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration",
abstract = "Efforts to restore rivers are increasingly concerned with the social implications of landscape change. However, the fundamental issue of how people make sense of local riverine environments in the context of restoration remains poorly understood. Our research examined influences on perception among local residents 14 years after a restoration scheme on the River Dearne in the north of England. Human-landscape relationships emerging from semi-structured interviews with 16 local residents were analysed using an interpretive research framework. Nine recurring factors influenced perception among local residents: scenic beauty; the condition of riparian vegetation and of river channel morphology; opportunities to observe flora and fauna; cleanliness of the riverine environment; access available to the river; connections between the river and the surrounding landscape; disturbance and change in the familiarity of the landscape following restoration. These factors were not solely related to tangible outcomes of the restoration scheme, but were also influenced by history, memories, traditions and practices associated with the river. Critically, these factors also interacted rather than operating in isolation and two idealised perceptual frameworks were developed to map these interactions. Our research contributes to theoretical understanding of the relationships between humans and landscape change, whilst also considering how restoration practice may better reflect these relationships. The importance of a social dimension to the template of possibilities for restoring any given river emerges, underpinning place-based design and implementation of river restoration schemes.",
keywords = "River rehabilitation, River enhancement, Interpretive social science, Landscape perception, Sustainable water management",
author = "Emma Westling and Ben Surridge and Liz Sharp and David Lerner",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.029",
language = "English",
volume = "519",
pages = "2613--2623",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",
number = "Part C",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of landscape change

T2 - long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration

AU - Westling, Emma

AU - Surridge, Ben

AU - Sharp, Liz

AU - Lerner, David

PY - 2014/11/27

Y1 - 2014/11/27

N2 - Efforts to restore rivers are increasingly concerned with the social implications of landscape change. However, the fundamental issue of how people make sense of local riverine environments in the context of restoration remains poorly understood. Our research examined influences on perception among local residents 14 years after a restoration scheme on the River Dearne in the north of England. Human-landscape relationships emerging from semi-structured interviews with 16 local residents were analysed using an interpretive research framework. Nine recurring factors influenced perception among local residents: scenic beauty; the condition of riparian vegetation and of river channel morphology; opportunities to observe flora and fauna; cleanliness of the riverine environment; access available to the river; connections between the river and the surrounding landscape; disturbance and change in the familiarity of the landscape following restoration. These factors were not solely related to tangible outcomes of the restoration scheme, but were also influenced by history, memories, traditions and practices associated with the river. Critically, these factors also interacted rather than operating in isolation and two idealised perceptual frameworks were developed to map these interactions. Our research contributes to theoretical understanding of the relationships between humans and landscape change, whilst also considering how restoration practice may better reflect these relationships. The importance of a social dimension to the template of possibilities for restoring any given river emerges, underpinning place-based design and implementation of river restoration schemes.

AB - Efforts to restore rivers are increasingly concerned with the social implications of landscape change. However, the fundamental issue of how people make sense of local riverine environments in the context of restoration remains poorly understood. Our research examined influences on perception among local residents 14 years after a restoration scheme on the River Dearne in the north of England. Human-landscape relationships emerging from semi-structured interviews with 16 local residents were analysed using an interpretive research framework. Nine recurring factors influenced perception among local residents: scenic beauty; the condition of riparian vegetation and of river channel morphology; opportunities to observe flora and fauna; cleanliness of the riverine environment; access available to the river; connections between the river and the surrounding landscape; disturbance and change in the familiarity of the landscape following restoration. These factors were not solely related to tangible outcomes of the restoration scheme, but were also influenced by history, memories, traditions and practices associated with the river. Critically, these factors also interacted rather than operating in isolation and two idealised perceptual frameworks were developed to map these interactions. Our research contributes to theoretical understanding of the relationships between humans and landscape change, whilst also considering how restoration practice may better reflect these relationships. The importance of a social dimension to the template of possibilities for restoring any given river emerges, underpinning place-based design and implementation of river restoration schemes.

KW - River rehabilitation

KW - River enhancement

KW - Interpretive social science

KW - Landscape perception

KW - Sustainable water management

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.029

M3 - Journal article

VL - 519

SP - 2613

EP - 2623

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

IS - Part C

ER -