Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Managing Technological Uncertainty in Science I...

Electronic data

  • Managing_technological_uncertainty_in_science_incubation_Final

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Friesl, M., Ford, C.J. and Mason, K. (2019), Managing technological uncertainty in science incubation: a prospective sensemaking perspective. R&D Management, 49: 668-683. doi:10.1111/radm.12356 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12356 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 450 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Managing Technological Uncertainty in Science Incubation: A Prospective Sense-Making Perspective

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Managing Technological Uncertainty in Science Incubation: A Prospective Sense-Making Perspective. / Friesl, Martin; Ford, Chris; Mason, Katy.
In: R and D Management, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.09.2019, p. 668-683.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Friesl M, Ford C, Mason K. Managing Technological Uncertainty in Science Incubation: A Prospective Sense-Making Perspective. R and D Management. 2019 Sept 1;49(4):668-683. Epub 2018 Dec 12. doi: 10.1111/radm.12356

Author

Bibtex

@article{f9731b664a884758ad1a8f0c1f9589ca,
title = "Managing Technological Uncertainty in Science Incubation: A Prospective Sense-Making Perspective",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the adaption challenge that confronts the top management team (TMT) of science incubators in situations of substantial technological uncertainty. To do that, we draw on the three-year longitudinal analysis of a major bioscience catalyst in the United Kingdom. Through the lens of 'prospective sensemaking', we follow the TMT as they work with stakeholders in their ecosystem to make sense of a significant technological shift: the convergence of life sciences, IT and other sciences in the health care environment. Our analysis reveals how prospective sensemaking resulted in the launch of a new strategy to exploit these emerging opportunities. However, stakeholders' increasingly fragmented interpretation of the term convergence and the anticipation of legitimacy challenges in the wider ecosystem resulted in the repositioning of the incubator. Our findings contribute to extant research on science incubation. In particular, the paper sheds light on the complex interactions of incubator TMT's with stakeholders in situations of technological change and uncertainty. Moreover, responding to technological change does not only affect the structural conditions of an incubator. Rather, it may also require changes to the positioning of the incubator in order to maintain legitimacy in the wider ecosystem. The paper also suggests managerial as well as policy-level implications.",
author = "Martin Friesl and Chris Ford and Katy Mason",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Friesl, M., Ford, C.J. and Mason, K. (2019), Managing technological uncertainty in science incubation: a prospective sensemaking perspective. R&D Management, 49: 668-683. doi:10.1111/radm.12356 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12356 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. ",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/radm.12356",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "668--683",
journal = "R and D Management",
issn = "0033-6807",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing Technological Uncertainty in Science Incubation

T2 - A Prospective Sense-Making Perspective

AU - Friesl, Martin

AU - Ford, Chris

AU - Mason, Katy

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Friesl, M., Ford, C.J. and Mason, K. (2019), Managing technological uncertainty in science incubation: a prospective sensemaking perspective. R&D Management, 49: 668-683. doi:10.1111/radm.12356 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12356 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - This paper focuses on the adaption challenge that confronts the top management team (TMT) of science incubators in situations of substantial technological uncertainty. To do that, we draw on the three-year longitudinal analysis of a major bioscience catalyst in the United Kingdom. Through the lens of 'prospective sensemaking', we follow the TMT as they work with stakeholders in their ecosystem to make sense of a significant technological shift: the convergence of life sciences, IT and other sciences in the health care environment. Our analysis reveals how prospective sensemaking resulted in the launch of a new strategy to exploit these emerging opportunities. However, stakeholders' increasingly fragmented interpretation of the term convergence and the anticipation of legitimacy challenges in the wider ecosystem resulted in the repositioning of the incubator. Our findings contribute to extant research on science incubation. In particular, the paper sheds light on the complex interactions of incubator TMT's with stakeholders in situations of technological change and uncertainty. Moreover, responding to technological change does not only affect the structural conditions of an incubator. Rather, it may also require changes to the positioning of the incubator in order to maintain legitimacy in the wider ecosystem. The paper also suggests managerial as well as policy-level implications.

AB - This paper focuses on the adaption challenge that confronts the top management team (TMT) of science incubators in situations of substantial technological uncertainty. To do that, we draw on the three-year longitudinal analysis of a major bioscience catalyst in the United Kingdom. Through the lens of 'prospective sensemaking', we follow the TMT as they work with stakeholders in their ecosystem to make sense of a significant technological shift: the convergence of life sciences, IT and other sciences in the health care environment. Our analysis reveals how prospective sensemaking resulted in the launch of a new strategy to exploit these emerging opportunities. However, stakeholders' increasingly fragmented interpretation of the term convergence and the anticipation of legitimacy challenges in the wider ecosystem resulted in the repositioning of the incubator. Our findings contribute to extant research on science incubation. In particular, the paper sheds light on the complex interactions of incubator TMT's with stakeholders in situations of technological change and uncertainty. Moreover, responding to technological change does not only affect the structural conditions of an incubator. Rather, it may also require changes to the positioning of the incubator in order to maintain legitimacy in the wider ecosystem. The paper also suggests managerial as well as policy-level implications.

U2 - 10.1111/radm.12356

DO - 10.1111/radm.12356

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 668

EP - 683

JO - R and D Management

JF - R and D Management

SN - 0033-6807

IS - 4

ER -