Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Measurement of the neutrino component of an ant...

Electronic data

  • PhysRevD.84.072005

    Rights statement: © 2011 American Physical Society

    Final published version, 490 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector. / MiniBooNE Collaboration.
In: Physical Review D – Particles and Fields, Vol. 84, No. 7, 072005, 26.10.2011.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

MiniBooNE Collaboration 2011, 'Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector', Physical Review D – Particles and Fields, vol. 84, no. 7, 072005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005

APA

MiniBooNE Collaboration (2011). Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector. Physical Review D – Particles and Fields, 84(7), Article 072005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005

Vancouver

MiniBooNE Collaboration. Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector. Physical Review D – Particles and Fields. 2011 Oct 26;84(7):072005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005

Author

MiniBooNE Collaboration. / Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector. In: Physical Review D – Particles and Fields. 2011 ; Vol. 84, No. 7.

Bibtex

@article{03a7c5cc62fb47439549d5f9dc997b78,
title = "Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector",
abstract = "Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity νμ-induced charged-current single π+ (CC1π+) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in νμ and ν̅ μ charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π+ analysis indicates the predicted νμ flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors.",
author = "A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo and Jaroslaw Nowak and {MiniBooNE Collaboration}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2011 American Physical Society",
year = "2011",
month = oct,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
journal = "Physical Review D – Particles and Fields",
issn = "1550-2368",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of the neutrino component of an anti-neutrino beam observed by a non-magnetized detector

AU - Aguilar-Arevalo, A.A.

AU - Nowak, Jaroslaw

AU - MiniBooNE Collaboration

N1 - © 2011 American Physical Society

PY - 2011/10/26

Y1 - 2011/10/26

N2 - Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity νμ-induced charged-current single π+ (CC1π+) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in νμ and ν̅ μ charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π+ analysis indicates the predicted νμ flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors.

AB - Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity νμ-induced charged-current single π+ (CC1π+) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in νμ and ν̅ μ charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π+ analysis indicates the predicted νμ flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors.

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 84

JO - Physical Review D – Particles and Fields

JF - Physical Review D – Particles and Fields

SN - 1550-2368

IS - 7

M1 - 072005

ER -