Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mirroring cannot account for understanding action

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Download3

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Science, 31 (1), pp 23-24 2008, © 2008 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 657 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mirroring cannot account for understanding action

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Mirroring cannot account for understanding action. / Carpendale, Jeremy I. M.; Lewis, Charlie.
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 1, 02.2008, p. 23-24.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Carpendale, JIM & Lewis, C 2008, 'Mirroring cannot account for understanding action', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07003147

APA

Carpendale, J. I. M., & Lewis, C. (2008). Mirroring cannot account for understanding action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(1), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07003147

Vancouver

Carpendale JIM, Lewis C. Mirroring cannot account for understanding action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2008 Feb;31(1):23-24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07003147

Author

Carpendale, Jeremy I. M. ; Lewis, Charlie. / Mirroring cannot account for understanding action. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2008 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 23-24.

Bibtex

@article{615438bca1af4c6db2e1351a8b46fc22,
title = "Mirroring cannot account for understanding action",
abstract = "Susan Hurley's shared circuits model (SCM) rightly begins in action and progresses through a series of layers; but it fails to reach action understanding because it relies on mirroring as a driving force, draws on heavily criticized theories, and neglects the need for shared experience in our grasp of social understanding.",
author = "Carpendale, {Jeremy I. M.} and Charlie Lewis",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Science, 31 (1), pp 23-24 2008, {\textcopyright} 2008 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2008",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X07003147",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "23--24",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mirroring cannot account for understanding action

AU - Carpendale, Jeremy I. M.

AU - Lewis, Charlie

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Science, 31 (1), pp 23-24 2008, © 2008 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Susan Hurley's shared circuits model (SCM) rightly begins in action and progresses through a series of layers; but it fails to reach action understanding because it relies on mirroring as a driving force, draws on heavily criticized theories, and neglects the need for shared experience in our grasp of social understanding.

AB - Susan Hurley's shared circuits model (SCM) rightly begins in action and progresses through a series of layers; but it fails to reach action understanding because it relies on mirroring as a driving force, draws on heavily criticized theories, and neglects the need for shared experience in our grasp of social understanding.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X07003147

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X07003147

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 23

EP - 24

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 1

ER -