Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Model selection confidence sets by likelihood r...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • MSCS_final

    Accepted author manuscript, 781 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing. / Zheng, Chao; Ferrari, Davide; Yang, Yuhong.
In: Statistica Sinica, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 827-851.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Zheng, C, Ferrari, D & Yang, Y 2019, 'Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing', Statistica Sinica, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 827-851. https://doi.org/10.5705/ss.202017.0006

APA

Zheng, C., Ferrari, D., & Yang, Y. (2019). Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing. Statistica Sinica, 29(2), 827-851. https://doi.org/10.5705/ss.202017.0006

Vancouver

Zheng C, Ferrari D, Yang Y. Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing. Statistica Sinica. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):827-851. doi: 10.5705/ss.202017.0006

Author

Zheng, Chao ; Ferrari, Davide ; Yang, Yuhong. / Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing. In: Statistica Sinica. 2019 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 827-851.

Bibtex

@article{d28cb383088f4ca596bb0b77b74b60ce,
title = "Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing",
abstract = "The traditional activity of model selection aims at discovering a single model superior to other candidate models. In the presence of pronounced noise, however, multiple models are often found to explain the same data equally well. To resolve this model selection ambiguity, we introduce the general approach of model selection confidence sets (MSCSs) based on likelihood ratio testing. A MSCS is defined as a list of models statistically indistinguishable from the true model at a user-specified level of confidence, which extends the familiar notion of confidence intervals to the model-selection framework. Our approach guarantees asymptotically correct coverage probability of the true model when both sample size and model dimension increase. We derive conditions under which the MSCS contains all the relevant information about the true model structure. In addition, we propose natural statistics based on the MSCS to measure importance of variables in a principled way that accounts for the overall model uncertainty. When the space of feasible models is large, MSCS is implemented by an adaptive stochastic search algorithm which samples MSCS models with high probability. The MSCS methodology is illustrated through numerical experiments on synthetic and real data examples",
keywords = "Adaptive sampling, likelihood ratio test, model selection confidence set, optimal detectability condition",
author = "Chao Zheng and Davide Ferrari and Yuhong Yang",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5705/ss.202017.0006",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "827--851",
journal = "Statistica Sinica",
issn = "1017-0405",
publisher = "Institute of Statistical Science",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model selection confidence sets by likelihood ratio testing

AU - Zheng, Chao

AU - Ferrari, Davide

AU - Yang, Yuhong

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - The traditional activity of model selection aims at discovering a single model superior to other candidate models. In the presence of pronounced noise, however, multiple models are often found to explain the same data equally well. To resolve this model selection ambiguity, we introduce the general approach of model selection confidence sets (MSCSs) based on likelihood ratio testing. A MSCS is defined as a list of models statistically indistinguishable from the true model at a user-specified level of confidence, which extends the familiar notion of confidence intervals to the model-selection framework. Our approach guarantees asymptotically correct coverage probability of the true model when both sample size and model dimension increase. We derive conditions under which the MSCS contains all the relevant information about the true model structure. In addition, we propose natural statistics based on the MSCS to measure importance of variables in a principled way that accounts for the overall model uncertainty. When the space of feasible models is large, MSCS is implemented by an adaptive stochastic search algorithm which samples MSCS models with high probability. The MSCS methodology is illustrated through numerical experiments on synthetic and real data examples

AB - The traditional activity of model selection aims at discovering a single model superior to other candidate models. In the presence of pronounced noise, however, multiple models are often found to explain the same data equally well. To resolve this model selection ambiguity, we introduce the general approach of model selection confidence sets (MSCSs) based on likelihood ratio testing. A MSCS is defined as a list of models statistically indistinguishable from the true model at a user-specified level of confidence, which extends the familiar notion of confidence intervals to the model-selection framework. Our approach guarantees asymptotically correct coverage probability of the true model when both sample size and model dimension increase. We derive conditions under which the MSCS contains all the relevant information about the true model structure. In addition, we propose natural statistics based on the MSCS to measure importance of variables in a principled way that accounts for the overall model uncertainty. When the space of feasible models is large, MSCS is implemented by an adaptive stochastic search algorithm which samples MSCS models with high probability. The MSCS methodology is illustrated through numerical experiments on synthetic and real data examples

KW - Adaptive sampling

KW - likelihood ratio test

KW - model selection confidence set

KW - optimal detectability condition

U2 - 10.5705/ss.202017.0006

DO - 10.5705/ss.202017.0006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 827

EP - 851

JO - Statistica Sinica

JF - Statistica Sinica

SN - 1017-0405

IS - 2

ER -