Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Multilingual construction of Communicative Deve...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Posterpeer-review

Published

Standard

Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa. / Alcock, Katie; Dowling, Tessa; Pascoe, Michelle et al.
2019. Poster session presented at Child Language Symposium 2019, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Posterpeer-review

Harvard

Alcock, K, Dowling, T, Pascoe, M, Mahura, O, Brookes, H, Ndhambi, M, Southwood, F & Oosthuizen, H 2019, 'Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa', Child Language Symposium 2019, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 10/07/19 - 12/07/19.

APA

Alcock, K., Dowling, T., Pascoe, M., Mahura, O., Brookes, H., Ndhambi, M., Southwood, F., & Oosthuizen, H. (2019). Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa. Poster session presented at Child Language Symposium 2019, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Vancouver

Alcock K, Dowling T, Pascoe M, Mahura O, Brookes H, Ndhambi M et al.. Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa. 2019. Poster session presented at Child Language Symposium 2019, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Author

Alcock, Katie ; Dowling, Tessa ; Pascoe, Michelle et al. / Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa. Poster session presented at Child Language Symposium 2019, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Bibtex

@conference{bdd982ae41f345aeb44d3af6de3b26b2,
title = "Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa",
abstract = "The Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) are a set of validated, parent-completed questionnaires assessing children's vocabulary, gesture, and grammatical development. They have many benefits but in particular administration does not require a qualified psychologist or speech-language therapist, making them ideal for settings with poor access to professionals. In addition they are cheap to administer at scale, again benefitting low resource settings. Further, they are relatively easy to develop for languages that are not well described in terms of development, meaning they can be adapted easily to under-studied languages.The CDIs have previously been adapted for Asian (1), Indo-European (2), other European (3), Pacific Island (4) and some African languages (5,6). They have been used successfully in studies of health risks (nutrition, infection) in sub-Saharan Africa (7), again meaning they are useful for impoverished settings and child development issues prevalent in such settings.We are in process of developing CDIs for six languages spoken in Southern Africa (IsiXhosa, Setswana, Sesotho, Xitsonga, Afrikaans and South African English). We have developed a common method for each language starting with a long list of words taken from other CDIs, following on to parent/practitioner assessment of face validity of these words in their translations, and continuing to piloting, instrument reduction, and validation. Within validation we look at correlation with age, and relationship to other variables including family socio-economic status, and child language performance measured in the home or lab. We also apply these methods to the assessment of gesture using the CDI.Some of the languages to be studied are related to each other (of the Bantu group of African languages) and to two languages for which CDIs have been developed in East Africa (5); for these we will highlight common grammatical development to be examined that exists in all of the related languages. In the East African setting parents were found to be valid observers of their child's morpheme omissions so this is a particular focus for assessment of grammatical development.To date we have developed four pilot versions (IsiXhosa, Setswana, Sesotho, and Afrikaans). Vocabulary in isiXhosa is found to be significantly related to toddler age, mother education, and first-born status, among other known correlates of child language (8). In Sesotho, toddler vocabulary is also significantly related to age (9). In the other languages (Xitsonga and SA English) we have created pre-pilot word lists and carried out focus groups with parents enabling us to determine the acceptability of the words on our long-lists.We conclude that construction of CDIs in multiple (some unrelated) languages simultaneously is possible with rigorous application of the same methods to each language. Where languages are under-studied, we can benefit from previous research and descriptions of development in related languages.1.Tardif, J. Child Lang. 36, (2009).2.Caselli, J. Child Lang. 26, (1999); Bleses, J. Child Lang. 35, (2008).3.Barrena, in A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain. (2008), vol. 9.4.Reese, First Language 35, (2015).5.Alcock, J. Child Lang. 42, (2015).6.Prado, Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 37, (2018).7.Prado, J. Child Psychol.Psychi. 58, (2017); Alcock, BMC research notes 9, (2016).8.Whitelaw, University of Cape Town (2018).9.Horn, Cape Town (2018).",
author = "Katie Alcock and Tessa Dowling and Michelle Pascoe and Olebeng Mahura and Heather Brookes and Mikateko Ndhambi and Frenette Southwood and Helena Oosthuizen",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
language = "English",
note = "Child Language Symposium 2019, CLShef19 ; Conference date: 10-07-2019 Through 12-07-2019",
url = "https://sites.google.com/a/sheffield.ac.uk/clshef2019/home",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Multilingual construction of Communicative Development Inventories in Southern Africa

AU - Alcock, Katie

AU - Dowling, Tessa

AU - Pascoe, Michelle

AU - Mahura, Olebeng

AU - Brookes, Heather

AU - Ndhambi, Mikateko

AU - Southwood, Frenette

AU - Oosthuizen, Helena

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - The Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) are a set of validated, parent-completed questionnaires assessing children's vocabulary, gesture, and grammatical development. They have many benefits but in particular administration does not require a qualified psychologist or speech-language therapist, making them ideal for settings with poor access to professionals. In addition they are cheap to administer at scale, again benefitting low resource settings. Further, they are relatively easy to develop for languages that are not well described in terms of development, meaning they can be adapted easily to under-studied languages.The CDIs have previously been adapted for Asian (1), Indo-European (2), other European (3), Pacific Island (4) and some African languages (5,6). They have been used successfully in studies of health risks (nutrition, infection) in sub-Saharan Africa (7), again meaning they are useful for impoverished settings and child development issues prevalent in such settings.We are in process of developing CDIs for six languages spoken in Southern Africa (IsiXhosa, Setswana, Sesotho, Xitsonga, Afrikaans and South African English). We have developed a common method for each language starting with a long list of words taken from other CDIs, following on to parent/practitioner assessment of face validity of these words in their translations, and continuing to piloting, instrument reduction, and validation. Within validation we look at correlation with age, and relationship to other variables including family socio-economic status, and child language performance measured in the home or lab. We also apply these methods to the assessment of gesture using the CDI.Some of the languages to be studied are related to each other (of the Bantu group of African languages) and to two languages for which CDIs have been developed in East Africa (5); for these we will highlight common grammatical development to be examined that exists in all of the related languages. In the East African setting parents were found to be valid observers of their child's morpheme omissions so this is a particular focus for assessment of grammatical development.To date we have developed four pilot versions (IsiXhosa, Setswana, Sesotho, and Afrikaans). Vocabulary in isiXhosa is found to be significantly related to toddler age, mother education, and first-born status, among other known correlates of child language (8). In Sesotho, toddler vocabulary is also significantly related to age (9). In the other languages (Xitsonga and SA English) we have created pre-pilot word lists and carried out focus groups with parents enabling us to determine the acceptability of the words on our long-lists.We conclude that construction of CDIs in multiple (some unrelated) languages simultaneously is possible with rigorous application of the same methods to each language. Where languages are under-studied, we can benefit from previous research and descriptions of development in related languages.1.Tardif, J. Child Lang. 36, (2009).2.Caselli, J. Child Lang. 26, (1999); Bleses, J. Child Lang. 35, (2008).3.Barrena, in A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain. (2008), vol. 9.4.Reese, First Language 35, (2015).5.Alcock, J. Child Lang. 42, (2015).6.Prado, Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 37, (2018).7.Prado, J. Child Psychol.Psychi. 58, (2017); Alcock, BMC research notes 9, (2016).8.Whitelaw, University of Cape Town (2018).9.Horn, Cape Town (2018).

AB - The Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) are a set of validated, parent-completed questionnaires assessing children's vocabulary, gesture, and grammatical development. They have many benefits but in particular administration does not require a qualified psychologist or speech-language therapist, making them ideal for settings with poor access to professionals. In addition they are cheap to administer at scale, again benefitting low resource settings. Further, they are relatively easy to develop for languages that are not well described in terms of development, meaning they can be adapted easily to under-studied languages.The CDIs have previously been adapted for Asian (1), Indo-European (2), other European (3), Pacific Island (4) and some African languages (5,6). They have been used successfully in studies of health risks (nutrition, infection) in sub-Saharan Africa (7), again meaning they are useful for impoverished settings and child development issues prevalent in such settings.We are in process of developing CDIs for six languages spoken in Southern Africa (IsiXhosa, Setswana, Sesotho, Xitsonga, Afrikaans and South African English). We have developed a common method for each language starting with a long list of words taken from other CDIs, following on to parent/practitioner assessment of face validity of these words in their translations, and continuing to piloting, instrument reduction, and validation. Within validation we look at correlation with age, and relationship to other variables including family socio-economic status, and child language performance measured in the home or lab. We also apply these methods to the assessment of gesture using the CDI.Some of the languages to be studied are related to each other (of the Bantu group of African languages) and to two languages for which CDIs have been developed in East Africa (5); for these we will highlight common grammatical development to be examined that exists in all of the related languages. In the East African setting parents were found to be valid observers of their child's morpheme omissions so this is a particular focus for assessment of grammatical development.To date we have developed four pilot versions (IsiXhosa, Setswana, Sesotho, and Afrikaans). Vocabulary in isiXhosa is found to be significantly related to toddler age, mother education, and first-born status, among other known correlates of child language (8). In Sesotho, toddler vocabulary is also significantly related to age (9). In the other languages (Xitsonga and SA English) we have created pre-pilot word lists and carried out focus groups with parents enabling us to determine the acceptability of the words on our long-lists.We conclude that construction of CDIs in multiple (some unrelated) languages simultaneously is possible with rigorous application of the same methods to each language. Where languages are under-studied, we can benefit from previous research and descriptions of development in related languages.1.Tardif, J. Child Lang. 36, (2009).2.Caselli, J. Child Lang. 26, (1999); Bleses, J. Child Lang. 35, (2008).3.Barrena, in A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain. (2008), vol. 9.4.Reese, First Language 35, (2015).5.Alcock, J. Child Lang. 42, (2015).6.Prado, Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 37, (2018).7.Prado, J. Child Psychol.Psychi. 58, (2017); Alcock, BMC research notes 9, (2016).8.Whitelaw, University of Cape Town (2018).9.Horn, Cape Town (2018).

M3 - Poster

T2 - Child Language Symposium 2019

Y2 - 10 July 2019 through 12 July 2019

ER -