Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things. / Lackovic, Natasa; Popova, Biliana.
In: Learning, Media and Technology , Vol. 46, No. 4, 31.12.2021, p. 531-549 .

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lackovic N, Popova B. Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things. Learning, Media and Technology . 2021 Dec 31;46(4):531-549 . Epub 2021 Jun 7. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694, 10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694

Author

Lackovic, Natasa ; Popova, Biliana. / Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things. In: Learning, Media and Technology . 2021 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 531-549 .

Bibtex

@article{1fb19ce0a221422b81d903992425c264,
title = "Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities{\textquoteright} media: accounting for bodies and things",
abstract = "Lecture prevails as a ubiquitous teaching and learning method across universities worldwide. Whereas lectures have been conceptualized from various text and language-centred perspectives, lecture{\textquoteright}s materiality has been scarcely explored, despite the development of “beyond-the-verbal” approaches to communication, practices and learning. To address the gap, this article explores socio-materiality of communication in 10 live recorded lectures, which also had the greatest number of viewers, on the websites or YouTube media channels by “top-ranked” universities in India, Japan, Russia, Egypt, Palestine, Spain, the USA, the UK, Italy and Canada. To do so, a pragmatic semiotic analysis of non-verbal elements of lecture is applied on the videos to “map” its material ingredients and explore related social meanings. The findings point at a few salient things and body characteristics in the sampled lectures, such as the monofocal lecture platform, the omnipresent blackboard, underrepresentation of female lecturers, low diversity and use of technology. We unpack these via “body and thing idiom” and suggest that the lecture needs to be conceptualized as a multimodal, socio-material performance. The article calls for wider acknowledgement and integration of materiality, embodiment, and multimodality in university lectures and the work done to understand and develop teaching at universities. ",
keywords = "Media, Lecture, Higher education teaching, multimodality, Socio-materiality",
author = "Natasa Lackovic and Biliana Popova",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Learning, Media and Technology on 07/06/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "531--549 ",
journal = "Learning, Media and Technology ",
issn = "1743-9884",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things

AU - Lackovic, Natasa

AU - Popova, Biliana

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Learning, Media and Technology on 07/06/2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694

PY - 2021/12/31

Y1 - 2021/12/31

N2 - Lecture prevails as a ubiquitous teaching and learning method across universities worldwide. Whereas lectures have been conceptualized from various text and language-centred perspectives, lecture’s materiality has been scarcely explored, despite the development of “beyond-the-verbal” approaches to communication, practices and learning. To address the gap, this article explores socio-materiality of communication in 10 live recorded lectures, which also had the greatest number of viewers, on the websites or YouTube media channels by “top-ranked” universities in India, Japan, Russia, Egypt, Palestine, Spain, the USA, the UK, Italy and Canada. To do so, a pragmatic semiotic analysis of non-verbal elements of lecture is applied on the videos to “map” its material ingredients and explore related social meanings. The findings point at a few salient things and body characteristics in the sampled lectures, such as the monofocal lecture platform, the omnipresent blackboard, underrepresentation of female lecturers, low diversity and use of technology. We unpack these via “body and thing idiom” and suggest that the lecture needs to be conceptualized as a multimodal, socio-material performance. The article calls for wider acknowledgement and integration of materiality, embodiment, and multimodality in university lectures and the work done to understand and develop teaching at universities.

AB - Lecture prevails as a ubiquitous teaching and learning method across universities worldwide. Whereas lectures have been conceptualized from various text and language-centred perspectives, lecture’s materiality has been scarcely explored, despite the development of “beyond-the-verbal” approaches to communication, practices and learning. To address the gap, this article explores socio-materiality of communication in 10 live recorded lectures, which also had the greatest number of viewers, on the websites or YouTube media channels by “top-ranked” universities in India, Japan, Russia, Egypt, Palestine, Spain, the USA, the UK, Italy and Canada. To do so, a pragmatic semiotic analysis of non-verbal elements of lecture is applied on the videos to “map” its material ingredients and explore related social meanings. The findings point at a few salient things and body characteristics in the sampled lectures, such as the monofocal lecture platform, the omnipresent blackboard, underrepresentation of female lecturers, low diversity and use of technology. We unpack these via “body and thing idiom” and suggest that the lecture needs to be conceptualized as a multimodal, socio-material performance. The article calls for wider acknowledgement and integration of materiality, embodiment, and multimodality in university lectures and the work done to understand and develop teaching at universities.

KW - Media

KW - Lecture

KW - Higher education teaching

KW - multimodality

KW - Socio-materiality

U2 - 10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694

DO - 10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 531

EP - 549

JO - Learning, Media and Technology

JF - Learning, Media and Technology

SN - 1743-9884

IS - 4

ER -