Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mutation-aware fault prediction

Electronic data

  • FullText

    Rights statement: © ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in ISSTA 2016 Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2931037.2931039

    Accepted author manuscript, 521 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mutation-aware fault prediction

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Close
Publication date18/07/2016
Host publicationISSTA 2016 Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages330-341
Number of pages12
ISBN (electronic)9781450343909
<mark>Original language</mark>English
Event25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2016 - Saarbrucken, Germany
Duration: 18/07/201620/07/2016

Conference

Conference25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2016
Country/TerritoryGermany
CitySaarbrucken
Period18/07/1620/07/16

Conference

Conference25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2016
Country/TerritoryGermany
CitySaarbrucken
Period18/07/1620/07/16

Abstract

We introduce mutation-aware fault prediction, which leverages additional guidance from metrics constructed in terms of mutants and the test cases that cover and detect them. We report the results of 12 sets of experiments, applying 4 Different predictive modelling techniques to 3 large real-world systems (both open and closed source). The results show that our proposal can significantly (p ≤ 0:05) improve fault prediction performance. Moreover, mutation-based metrics lie in the top 5% most frequently relied upon fault predictors in 10 of the 12 sets of experiments, and provide the majority of the top ten fault predictors in 9 of the 12 sets of experiments.

Bibliographic note

© ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in ISSTA 2016 Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2931037.2931039