Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic. / Frith, Lucy; Draper, Heather; Fovargue, Sara et al.
In: American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 21, No. 8, 27.07.2021, p. 34-37.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Frith, L, Draper, H, Fovargue, S, Baines, P, Redhead, C & Chiumento, A 2021, 'Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic', American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363

APA

Frith, L., Draper, H., Fovargue, S., Baines, P., Redhead, C., & Chiumento, A. (2021). Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic. American Journal of Bioethics, 21(8), 34-37. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363

Vancouver

Frith L, Draper H, Fovargue S, Baines P, Redhead C, Chiumento A. Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic. American Journal of Bioethics. 2021 Jul 27;21(8):34-37. Epub 2021 Jul 27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363

Author

Frith, Lucy ; Draper, Heather ; Fovargue, Sara et al. / Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’ : Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic. In: American Journal of Bioethics. 2021 ; Vol. 21, No. 8. pp. 34-37.

Bibtex

@article{5c73cb24c523417d99f559b069b39623,
title = "Neither {\textquoteleft}Crisis Light{\textquoteright} nor {\textquoteleft}Business as Usual{\textquoteright}: Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic",
abstract = "We have been researching the distinctive ethical issues raised by what we have called “the reset period,” when non-Covid services resumed alongside the continuing pandemic in the UK. In this commentary, we will first consider the similarities and differences between the reset and contingency phases, as described by Alfandre et al. We will then unpack Alfandre et al.{\textquoteright}s position that the contingency phase should be characterized by operating a standard of care that is functionally equivalent to “usual” practice, arguing that in the reset and contingency phases, the standards of “usual” care may be unobtainable and, in these circumstances, we cannot fall back on the primacy of “patient centered care.” Consequently, different ethical principles and balancing strategies are needed when care is neither “crisis light” nor “business as usual.” We will conclude by reflecting on what these should be.",
author = "Lucy Frith and Heather Draper and Sara Fovargue and Paul Baines and Caroline Redhead and Anna Chiumento",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "34--37",
journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "1526-5161",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neither ‘Crisis Light’ nor ‘Business as Usual’

T2 - Considering the Distinctive Ethical Issues Raised by the Contingency and Reset Phases of a Pandemic

AU - Frith, Lucy

AU - Draper, Heather

AU - Fovargue, Sara

AU - Baines, Paul

AU - Redhead, Caroline

AU - Chiumento, Anna

PY - 2021/7/27

Y1 - 2021/7/27

N2 - We have been researching the distinctive ethical issues raised by what we have called “the reset period,” when non-Covid services resumed alongside the continuing pandemic in the UK. In this commentary, we will first consider the similarities and differences between the reset and contingency phases, as described by Alfandre et al. We will then unpack Alfandre et al.’s position that the contingency phase should be characterized by operating a standard of care that is functionally equivalent to “usual” practice, arguing that in the reset and contingency phases, the standards of “usual” care may be unobtainable and, in these circumstances, we cannot fall back on the primacy of “patient centered care.” Consequently, different ethical principles and balancing strategies are needed when care is neither “crisis light” nor “business as usual.” We will conclude by reflecting on what these should be.

AB - We have been researching the distinctive ethical issues raised by what we have called “the reset period,” when non-Covid services resumed alongside the continuing pandemic in the UK. In this commentary, we will first consider the similarities and differences between the reset and contingency phases, as described by Alfandre et al. We will then unpack Alfandre et al.’s position that the contingency phase should be characterized by operating a standard of care that is functionally equivalent to “usual” practice, arguing that in the reset and contingency phases, the standards of “usual” care may be unobtainable and, in these circumstances, we cannot fall back on the primacy of “patient centered care.” Consequently, different ethical principles and balancing strategies are needed when care is neither “crisis light” nor “business as usual.” We will conclude by reflecting on what these should be.

U2 - 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363

DO - 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 34

EP - 37

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 8

ER -