Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/on-mathematical-approaches-to-modelling-slender-liquid-jets-with-a-curved-trajectory/A34B897F9BB98C3CF5B95F3BFC257498 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 844, pp 905-916 2018, © 2018 Cambridge University Press.
Accepted author manuscript, 164 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On mathematical approaches to modelling slender liquid jets with a curved trajectory
AU - Decent, Stephen Paul
AU - Părău, E. I.
AU - Simmons, M. H.
AU - Uddin, J.
N1 - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/on-mathematical-approaches-to-modelling-slender-liquid-jets-with-a-curved-trajectory/A34B897F9BB98C3CF5B95F3BFC257498 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 844, pp 905-916 2018, © 2018 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2018/6/10
Y1 - 2018/6/10
N2 - Slender liquid jets that have a curved trajectory have been examined in a range of papers using a method introduced in Wallwork et al. (Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Free-Surface Flows, 2000, Kluwer; J. Fluid Mech., vol. 459, 2002, pp. 43–65) and Decent et al. (J. Engng Maths, vol. 42, 2002, pp. 265–282), for jets that emerge from an orifice on the surface of a rotating cylindrical container, successfully comparing computational results to measurements arising from laboratory experiments. Wallwork et al. (2000, 2002) and Decent et al. (2002) based their analyses on the slenderness of the jet, and neglected the torsion of the centreline of the jet, which is valid since in most situations examined the torsion is zero or small. Shikhmurzaev & Sisoev (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 819, 2017, pp. 352–400) used differential geometry and incorporated the torsion. This paper shows that these two methods produce identical results at leading order when the torsion is zero or when the torsion is O(1) , in an asymptotic framework based upon the slenderness of the jet, and shows that the method of Wallwork et al. (2000, 2002) and Decent et al. (2002) is accurate for parameters corresponding to scenarios previously examined and also when the torsion is O(1) . It is shown that the method of Shikhmurzaev & Sisoev (2017) should be used when the torsion is asymptotically large or when the jet is not slender.
AB - Slender liquid jets that have a curved trajectory have been examined in a range of papers using a method introduced in Wallwork et al. (Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Free-Surface Flows, 2000, Kluwer; J. Fluid Mech., vol. 459, 2002, pp. 43–65) and Decent et al. (J. Engng Maths, vol. 42, 2002, pp. 265–282), for jets that emerge from an orifice on the surface of a rotating cylindrical container, successfully comparing computational results to measurements arising from laboratory experiments. Wallwork et al. (2000, 2002) and Decent et al. (2002) based their analyses on the slenderness of the jet, and neglected the torsion of the centreline of the jet, which is valid since in most situations examined the torsion is zero or small. Shikhmurzaev & Sisoev (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 819, 2017, pp. 352–400) used differential geometry and incorporated the torsion. This paper shows that these two methods produce identical results at leading order when the torsion is zero or when the torsion is O(1) , in an asymptotic framework based upon the slenderness of the jet, and shows that the method of Wallwork et al. (2000, 2002) and Decent et al. (2002) is accurate for parameters corresponding to scenarios previously examined and also when the torsion is O(1) . It is shown that the method of Shikhmurzaev & Sisoev (2017) should be used when the torsion is asymptotically large or when the jet is not slender.
U2 - 10.1017/jfm.2018.221
DO - 10.1017/jfm.2018.221
M3 - Journal article
VL - 844
SP - 905
EP - 916
JO - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
JF - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
SN - 0022-1120
ER -