Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT
View graph of relations

On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT: the significance of reflexivity and diffraction

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT: the significance of reflexivity and diffraction. / Contu, Alessia; Pecis, Lara.
2016. Paper presented at IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference, Dublin, Ireland.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Harvard

Contu, A & Pecis, L 2016, 'On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT: the significance of reflexivity and diffraction', Paper presented at IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 8/12/16 - 9/12/16.

APA

Contu, A., & Pecis, L. (2016). On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT: the significance of reflexivity and diffraction. Paper presented at IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference, Dublin, Ireland.

Vancouver

Contu A, Pecis L. On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT: the significance of reflexivity and diffraction. 2016. Paper presented at IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference, Dublin, Ireland.

Author

Contu, Alessia ; Pecis, Lara. / On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT : the significance of reflexivity and diffraction. Paper presented at IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference, Dublin, Ireland.

Bibtex

@conference{e195d75870004135b1df185ee07d7a1d,
title = "On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT: the significance of reflexivity and diffraction",
abstract = "Reflexivity is often considered fundamental for the {\textquoteleft}production{\textquoteright} of responsible and ethical ethnographic work. Through reflexivity one can account as a researcher and author of the ethnographic practice, and acknowledge one{\textquoteright}s responsibilities in knowledge-making and the impact this work has on others. Yet, it has been suggested that same practice has a darker side, as it tends to {\textquoteleft}overshadowing participants{\textquoteright}, producing a {\textquoteleft}warped narcissism{\textquoteright}, and {\textquoteleft}self-indulgence{\textquoteright}. We explore these argumentative positions on reflexivity in ethnography, and clarify that the premise of a “narcissism” critique is an ontology of separateness that the concept embeds. We suggest and illustrate empirically how an ontology of inseparability of participants and researchers, such as one engrained in diffraction, can contribute in extricating narcissist tendencies of those ethnographic works weighting more on the left side of the “Self-Other” continuum. Our theoretical contribution is to elaborate a framework enabling a politically responsible ethnographic practice, which takes differences as methodological premise for grasping a phenomenon.",
author = "Alessia Contu and Lara Pecis",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "11",
language = "English",
note = "IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference ; Conference date: 08-12-2016 Through 09-12-2016",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - On the knowledge making enterprise in OMT

T2 - IFIP Work Group 8.2 Conference

AU - Contu, Alessia

AU - Pecis, Lara

PY - 2016/12/11

Y1 - 2016/12/11

N2 - Reflexivity is often considered fundamental for the ‘production’ of responsible and ethical ethnographic work. Through reflexivity one can account as a researcher and author of the ethnographic practice, and acknowledge one’s responsibilities in knowledge-making and the impact this work has on others. Yet, it has been suggested that same practice has a darker side, as it tends to ‘overshadowing participants’, producing a ‘warped narcissism’, and ‘self-indulgence’. We explore these argumentative positions on reflexivity in ethnography, and clarify that the premise of a “narcissism” critique is an ontology of separateness that the concept embeds. We suggest and illustrate empirically how an ontology of inseparability of participants and researchers, such as one engrained in diffraction, can contribute in extricating narcissist tendencies of those ethnographic works weighting more on the left side of the “Self-Other” continuum. Our theoretical contribution is to elaborate a framework enabling a politically responsible ethnographic practice, which takes differences as methodological premise for grasping a phenomenon.

AB - Reflexivity is often considered fundamental for the ‘production’ of responsible and ethical ethnographic work. Through reflexivity one can account as a researcher and author of the ethnographic practice, and acknowledge one’s responsibilities in knowledge-making and the impact this work has on others. Yet, it has been suggested that same practice has a darker side, as it tends to ‘overshadowing participants’, producing a ‘warped narcissism’, and ‘self-indulgence’. We explore these argumentative positions on reflexivity in ethnography, and clarify that the premise of a “narcissism” critique is an ontology of separateness that the concept embeds. We suggest and illustrate empirically how an ontology of inseparability of participants and researchers, such as one engrained in diffraction, can contribute in extricating narcissist tendencies of those ethnographic works weighting more on the left side of the “Self-Other” continuum. Our theoretical contribution is to elaborate a framework enabling a politically responsible ethnographic practice, which takes differences as methodological premise for grasping a phenomenon.

M3 - Conference paper

Y2 - 8 December 2016 through 9 December 2016

ER -