Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Online doctoral education

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Online doctoral education: A synthesis of literature

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

Online doctoral education: A synthesis of literature. / Lee, Kyungmee.
Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Singapore: Springer, 2022.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Lee, K 2022, Online doctoral education: A synthesis of literature. in Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_66-1

APA

Lee, K. (2022). Online doctoral education: A synthesis of literature. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_66-1

Vancouver

Lee K. Online doctoral education: A synthesis of literature. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Singapore: Springer. 2022 doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_66-1

Author

Lee, Kyungmee. / Online doctoral education : A synthesis of literature. Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Singapore : Springer, 2022.

Bibtex

@inbook{dc98fc494e0e4fb4a7b8131547e441ec,
title = "Online doctoral education: A synthesis of literature",
abstract = "This chapter discusses different factors underpinning the development of online doctoral education and pedagogical concerns influencing the design of online doctoral programmes. The rapid development of online doctoral education has been guided by recent changes in doctoral education and distance education contexts, both conceptually and empirically. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the nature of online doctoral education, 47 journal articles concerning the design of existing online doctoral programmes were systematically selected and reviewed. The review results demonstrate that online doctoral education is a complex entity developed and influenced by a dynamic interplay among multiple factors relevant to different aspects of online higher education, professional doctoral education and internationalised education. However, there has been a lack of holistic research approaches to develop a comprehensive understanding of online doctoral education. In particular, literature grounded in online higher education and professional doctoral education scholarship has not been effectively integrated and synthesized, creating an unhelpful chasm. Within the chasm, a range of pedagogical concerns and contradictions have emerged in online doctoral programmes, which can be understood and addressed only when online doctoral educators have a holistic perspective bridging the two. Therefore, while the present review reveals valuable insights into online doctoral education research and practice, it also suggests that more research needs to be conducted using a more comprehensive theoretical understanding of online doctoral studies and their experiences. ",
author = "Kyungmee Lee",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_66-1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789811903519",
booktitle = "Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Online doctoral education

T2 - A synthesis of literature

AU - Lee, Kyungmee

PY - 2022/9/16

Y1 - 2022/9/16

N2 - This chapter discusses different factors underpinning the development of online doctoral education and pedagogical concerns influencing the design of online doctoral programmes. The rapid development of online doctoral education has been guided by recent changes in doctoral education and distance education contexts, both conceptually and empirically. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the nature of online doctoral education, 47 journal articles concerning the design of existing online doctoral programmes were systematically selected and reviewed. The review results demonstrate that online doctoral education is a complex entity developed and influenced by a dynamic interplay among multiple factors relevant to different aspects of online higher education, professional doctoral education and internationalised education. However, there has been a lack of holistic research approaches to develop a comprehensive understanding of online doctoral education. In particular, literature grounded in online higher education and professional doctoral education scholarship has not been effectively integrated and synthesized, creating an unhelpful chasm. Within the chasm, a range of pedagogical concerns and contradictions have emerged in online doctoral programmes, which can be understood and addressed only when online doctoral educators have a holistic perspective bridging the two. Therefore, while the present review reveals valuable insights into online doctoral education research and practice, it also suggests that more research needs to be conducted using a more comprehensive theoretical understanding of online doctoral studies and their experiences.

AB - This chapter discusses different factors underpinning the development of online doctoral education and pedagogical concerns influencing the design of online doctoral programmes. The rapid development of online doctoral education has been guided by recent changes in doctoral education and distance education contexts, both conceptually and empirically. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the nature of online doctoral education, 47 journal articles concerning the design of existing online doctoral programmes were systematically selected and reviewed. The review results demonstrate that online doctoral education is a complex entity developed and influenced by a dynamic interplay among multiple factors relevant to different aspects of online higher education, professional doctoral education and internationalised education. However, there has been a lack of holistic research approaches to develop a comprehensive understanding of online doctoral education. In particular, literature grounded in online higher education and professional doctoral education scholarship has not been effectively integrated and synthesized, creating an unhelpful chasm. Within the chasm, a range of pedagogical concerns and contradictions have emerged in online doctoral programmes, which can be understood and addressed only when online doctoral educators have a holistic perspective bridging the two. Therefore, while the present review reveals valuable insights into online doctoral education research and practice, it also suggests that more research needs to be conducted using a more comprehensive theoretical understanding of online doctoral studies and their experiences.

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_66-1

DO - 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_66-1

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9789811903519

BT - Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education

PB - Springer

CY - Singapore

ER -