Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Online tasks and students’ transformative agency

Electronic data

  • MoffittBligh_preprint

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Vocational Education & Training on 02/11/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13636820.2021.1998792

    Accepted author manuscript, 636 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Online tasks and students’ transformative agency: double-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Online tasks and students’ transformative agency: double-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops. / Moffitt, Phil; Bligh, Brett.
In: Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Vol. 76, No. 1, 31.01.2024, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Moffitt P, Bligh B. Online tasks and students’ transformative agency: double-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 2024 Jan 31;76(1):1-24. Epub 2021 Nov 2. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2021.1998792

Author

Bibtex

@article{27f23b104f794e5e8cbcf4c6cc0b602c,
title = "Online tasks and students{\textquoteright} transformative agency: double-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops",
abstract = "Learner agency, often understood in terms of self-direction and negotiated engagement, is considered important in technical and vocational education and training (TVET). Yet nurturing and supporting agency is resource-intensive and difficult. In this paper, we consider learner agency for online TVET—a setting where content delivery models can be experienced as stultifying. We document the design and evaluation of specific task designs using the method and principle of double-stimulation, where prompts help participants to reconceptualise problematic situations and break out of conflicting motives. We draw on data from a research-intervention with adult learners undertaking a facilities management diploma online, while working. We explore how, across nine online workshops, task designs engendered transformative agency: the ability to collaboratively diverge from instructional intent, question dilemmatic conditions, and propose and enact change. We claim (1) that specific double-stimulation tasks encouraged participants to engage in understanding institutional practice, exposing conflict, and enacting change; (2) that participants came to view their own problematic conditions as stimuli for resistance, criticism, and development; and (3) that online resources were crucial for highlighting evidence of failure and learners{\textquoteright} potential roles in change. Our findings are of importance to help learners set and evaluate their own learning agendas.",
keywords = "VET and development, VET and the labour market, learning in life & work transitions, learning in the professions, workplace learning",
author = "Phil Moffitt and Brett Bligh",
year = "2024",
month = jan,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/13636820.2021.1998792",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Education and Training",
issn = "1363-6820",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online tasks and students’ transformative agency

T2 - double-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops

AU - Moffitt, Phil

AU - Bligh, Brett

PY - 2024/1/31

Y1 - 2024/1/31

N2 - Learner agency, often understood in terms of self-direction and negotiated engagement, is considered important in technical and vocational education and training (TVET). Yet nurturing and supporting agency is resource-intensive and difficult. In this paper, we consider learner agency for online TVET—a setting where content delivery models can be experienced as stultifying. We document the design and evaluation of specific task designs using the method and principle of double-stimulation, where prompts help participants to reconceptualise problematic situations and break out of conflicting motives. We draw on data from a research-intervention with adult learners undertaking a facilities management diploma online, while working. We explore how, across nine online workshops, task designs engendered transformative agency: the ability to collaboratively diverge from instructional intent, question dilemmatic conditions, and propose and enact change. We claim (1) that specific double-stimulation tasks encouraged participants to engage in understanding institutional practice, exposing conflict, and enacting change; (2) that participants came to view their own problematic conditions as stimuli for resistance, criticism, and development; and (3) that online resources were crucial for highlighting evidence of failure and learners’ potential roles in change. Our findings are of importance to help learners set and evaluate their own learning agendas.

AB - Learner agency, often understood in terms of self-direction and negotiated engagement, is considered important in technical and vocational education and training (TVET). Yet nurturing and supporting agency is resource-intensive and difficult. In this paper, we consider learner agency for online TVET—a setting where content delivery models can be experienced as stultifying. We document the design and evaluation of specific task designs using the method and principle of double-stimulation, where prompts help participants to reconceptualise problematic situations and break out of conflicting motives. We draw on data from a research-intervention with adult learners undertaking a facilities management diploma online, while working. We explore how, across nine online workshops, task designs engendered transformative agency: the ability to collaboratively diverge from instructional intent, question dilemmatic conditions, and propose and enact change. We claim (1) that specific double-stimulation tasks encouraged participants to engage in understanding institutional practice, exposing conflict, and enacting change; (2) that participants came to view their own problematic conditions as stimuli for resistance, criticism, and development; and (3) that online resources were crucial for highlighting evidence of failure and learners’ potential roles in change. Our findings are of importance to help learners set and evaluate their own learning agendas.

KW - VET and development

KW - VET and the labour market

KW - learning in life & work transitions

KW - learning in the professions

KW - workplace learning

U2 - 10.1080/13636820.2021.1998792

DO - 10.1080/13636820.2021.1998792

M3 - Journal article

VL - 76

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

JF - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

SN - 1363-6820

IS - 1

ER -