Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Open but Unfair- The role of social justice in ...
View graph of relations

Open but Unfair- The role of social justice in Open Access publishing

Research output: Exhibits, objects and web-based outputsBlog

Published

Standard

Open but Unfair- The role of social justice in Open Access publishing. Batterbury, Simon (Author). 2020.

Research output: Exhibits, objects and web-based outputsBlog

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@misc{54b8beb5e1854d3983a970a304a08eaa,
title = "Open but Unfair- The role of social justice in Open Access publishing",
abstract = "Stage one of the Open Access (OA) movement promoted the democratization of scholarly knowledge, making work available so that anybody could read it. However, publication in highly ranked journals is becoming very costly, feeding the same vendor capitalists that OA was designed to sidestep. In this Q&A, Simon Batterbury argues that when prestige is valued over publication ethics, a paradoxical situation emerges where conversations about social justice take place in unjust journals. Academic freedom and integrity are at risk unless Open Access becomes not simply about the democratization of knowledge, but the ethics of its publication too.",
author = "Simon Batterbury",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "24",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - ADVS

T1 - Open but Unfair- The role of social justice in Open Access publishing

AU - Batterbury, Simon

PY - 2020/10/24

Y1 - 2020/10/24

N2 - Stage one of the Open Access (OA) movement promoted the democratization of scholarly knowledge, making work available so that anybody could read it. However, publication in highly ranked journals is becoming very costly, feeding the same vendor capitalists that OA was designed to sidestep. In this Q&A, Simon Batterbury argues that when prestige is valued over publication ethics, a paradoxical situation emerges where conversations about social justice take place in unjust journals. Academic freedom and integrity are at risk unless Open Access becomes not simply about the democratization of knowledge, but the ethics of its publication too.

AB - Stage one of the Open Access (OA) movement promoted the democratization of scholarly knowledge, making work available so that anybody could read it. However, publication in highly ranked journals is becoming very costly, feeding the same vendor capitalists that OA was designed to sidestep. In this Q&A, Simon Batterbury argues that when prestige is valued over publication ethics, a paradoxical situation emerges where conversations about social justice take place in unjust journals. Academic freedom and integrity are at risk unless Open Access becomes not simply about the democratization of knowledge, but the ethics of its publication too.

M3 - Blog

ER -