Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Peer to Peer Multiliteracies

Electronic data

  • BAAL P2PDML final paper 2019

    Final published version, 789 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Peer to Peer Multiliteracies: a new concept of accessibility

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Publication date29/08/2019
Number of pages14
<mark>Original language</mark>English
EventBritish Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference : Broadening the Horizons of Applied Linguistics - Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
Duration: 29/08/201931/08/2019


ConferenceBritish Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference
Abbreviated titleBAAL 2019
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
Internet address


In our project “Peer to Peer Deaf Multiliteracies: research into a sustainable approach to the education of deaf children and young adults in the Global South (2017-2020) (ESRC/DFID) we are working with deaf learners, teachers and research assistants in India, Ghana and Uganda. Our overall ethos is a commitment to “Real Literacies” (Street, 2012) whereby we work to identify and support learners’ already existing authentic interests and literacy practices. Our pilot project, “Peer to Peer Deaf Literacies” identified that this approach led to learner gains beyond the original focus of improvements in their English reading and writing. Engagements indeed led to measurable gains in English literacy skills for learners, but also to increased capacities in multiliteracies including Sign Language skills, metalinguistic competencies, use of online communication technologies and there was evidence of a deepening of the range of interests accessible through literacies. In the current project we have made use of this awareness of deaf multiliteracies from the beginning. Rather than view accessibility for deaf learners as a question of the provision of additional features to existing content we have built it in to project design. This is exemplified by identification of needs within the target deaf communities, through our workshops with deaf leaders, and carried on via recruitment of deaf staff, with full acceptance of the community’s culture and communication preferences (e.g. WhatsApp groups with embedded videos). Most importantly, the content itself is co-designed by deaf learners and their tutors. The UK team provides training, technical infrastructure and theoretical framing. We propose that this approach is a novel in terms of conceptualising accessibility in participatory terms and also that it brings multiliteracies fully into current reconceptions of the positive roles inclusion of deaf communities can bring to theorising multimodalities (Kusters, Spotti, Swanwick, & Tapio, 2017).