Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Potential importance of residual confounding in...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Letter

Published

Standard

Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies : Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele. / Verbeek, J.H.; Whaley, P.; Morgan, R.L. et al.

In: Environment International, Vol. 160, 107010, 28.02.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Letter

Harvard

Verbeek, JH, Whaley, P, Morgan, RL, Taylor, KW, Rooney, AA, Schwingshackl, L, Hoving, JL, Vittal Katikireddi, S, Shea, B, Mustafa, RA, Murad, MH & Schünemann, HJ 2022, 'Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele', Environment International, vol. 160, 107010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107010

APA

Verbeek, J. H., Whaley, P., Morgan, R. L., Taylor, K. W., Rooney, A. A., Schwingshackl, L., Hoving, J. L., Vittal Katikireddi, S., Shea, B., Mustafa, R. A., Murad, M. H., & Schünemann, H. J. (2022). Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele. Environment International, 160, [107010]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107010

Vancouver

Verbeek JH, Whaley P, Morgan RL, Taylor KW, Rooney AA, Schwingshackl L et al. Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele. Environment International. 2022 Feb 28;160:107010. Epub 2021 Dec 21. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107010

Author

Verbeek, J.H. ; Whaley, P. ; Morgan, R.L. et al. / Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies : Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele. In: Environment International. 2022 ; Vol. 160.

Bibtex

@article{46b67de2f731466c8415f3feaf8131e5,
title = "Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele",
author = "J.H. Verbeek and P. Whaley and R.L. Morgan and K.W. Taylor and A.A. Rooney and L. Schwingshackl and J.L. Hoving and {Vittal Katikireddi}, S. and B. Shea and R.A. Mustafa and M.H. Murad and H.J. Sch{\"u}nemann",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.envint.2021.107010",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
journal = "Environment International",
issn = "0160-4120",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies

T2 - Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele

AU - Verbeek, J.H.

AU - Whaley, P.

AU - Morgan, R.L.

AU - Taylor, K.W.

AU - Rooney, A.A.

AU - Schwingshackl, L.

AU - Hoving, J.L.

AU - Vittal Katikireddi, S.

AU - Shea, B.

AU - Mustafa, R.A.

AU - Murad, M.H.

AU - Schünemann, H.J.

PY - 2022/2/28

Y1 - 2022/2/28

U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107010

DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107010

M3 - Letter

VL - 160

JO - Environment International

JF - Environment International

SN - 0160-4120

M1 - 107010

ER -