Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Co...
View graph of relations

Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. / Schauer, Gila.
In: Language Learning, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.06.2006, p. 269-318.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schauer G. Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning. 2006 Jun 1;56(2):269-318. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x

Author

Schauer, Gila. / Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. In: Language Learning. 2006 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 269-318.

Bibtex

@article{efdbb607f60e4329b92a274ecd6641ea,
title = "Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development.",
abstract = "The study reported on in this article set out to replicate and extend Bardovi‐Harlig and D{\"o}rnyei's (1998) investigation of pragmatic awareness by addressing two research questions: (a) Do learners in English as a foreign language (EFL) and English as a second language (ESL) contexts display differences in their recognition and rating of pragmatic and grammatical errors?(b) Do ESL learners increase their pragmatic awareness during an extended stay in the target environment? The data were elicited using Bardovi‐Harlig and D{\"o}rnyei's video‐and‐questionnaire instrument accompanied by post hoc interviews. The 53 participants in the study included 16 German students studying at a British university, 17 German students enrolled in a higher education institution in Germany, and 20 British English native‐speaking controls. The data show that the German EFL participants were less aware of pragmatic infelicities than the ESL group and that the ESL learners increased their pragmatic awareness significantly during their stay in Great Britain.",
author = "Gila Schauer",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Linguistics",
year = "2006",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "269--318",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development.

AU - Schauer, Gila

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Linguistics

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - The study reported on in this article set out to replicate and extend Bardovi‐Harlig and Dörnyei's (1998) investigation of pragmatic awareness by addressing two research questions: (a) Do learners in English as a foreign language (EFL) and English as a second language (ESL) contexts display differences in their recognition and rating of pragmatic and grammatical errors?(b) Do ESL learners increase their pragmatic awareness during an extended stay in the target environment? The data were elicited using Bardovi‐Harlig and Dörnyei's video‐and‐questionnaire instrument accompanied by post hoc interviews. The 53 participants in the study included 16 German students studying at a British university, 17 German students enrolled in a higher education institution in Germany, and 20 British English native‐speaking controls. The data show that the German EFL participants were less aware of pragmatic infelicities than the ESL group and that the ESL learners increased their pragmatic awareness significantly during their stay in Great Britain.

AB - The study reported on in this article set out to replicate and extend Bardovi‐Harlig and Dörnyei's (1998) investigation of pragmatic awareness by addressing two research questions: (a) Do learners in English as a foreign language (EFL) and English as a second language (ESL) contexts display differences in their recognition and rating of pragmatic and grammatical errors?(b) Do ESL learners increase their pragmatic awareness during an extended stay in the target environment? The data were elicited using Bardovi‐Harlig and Dörnyei's video‐and‐questionnaire instrument accompanied by post hoc interviews. The 53 participants in the study included 16 German students studying at a British university, 17 German students enrolled in a higher education institution in Germany, and 20 British English native‐speaking controls. The data show that the German EFL participants were less aware of pragmatic infelicities than the ESL group and that the ESL learners increased their pragmatic awareness significantly during their stay in Great Britain.

U2 - 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 56

SP - 269

EP - 318

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 2

ER -