Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Engagement With Conversational Agents in Mental Health Therapy by Examining the Role of Epistemic Trust, Personality, and Fear of Intimacy
T2 - Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study
AU - Guglielmucci, Fanny
AU - Di Basilio, Daniela
PY - 2025/7/30
Y1 - 2025/7/30
N2 - The use of conversational agents (CAs) in mental health therapy is gaining traction due to their accessibility, anonymity, and nonjudgmental nature. However, understanding the psychological factors driving preferences for CA-based therapy remains critical to ensure ethical and effective application. Variables such as epistemic trust, attachment styles, personality traits, and fear of intimacy appear central in shaping attitudes toward these artificial intelligence (AI)-driven interventions. This study aimed to investigate the role of epistemic trust, attachment styles, personality traits, and fear of intimacy in influencing individuals' willingness to engage with CA-based therapy. An online survey was administered to 876 psychology students, yielding 736 responses (84.01% response rate). Variables measured included epistemic trust, attachment styles, personality traits, and fear of intimacy. A 5-point ordinal scale assessed willingness to engage in CA-based therapy. The data were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression models, including proportional odds models (POMs), nonproportional odds models (NPOMs), and partial proportional odds models (PPOMs), with residual deviance used to compare model fit. The PPOM provided the best model fit (residual deviance=3530.47), outperforming both the NPOM (deviance=6244.01) and the POM based on Brant test results indicating violations of the proportional odds assumption (χ²105=187.8; P
AB - The use of conversational agents (CAs) in mental health therapy is gaining traction due to their accessibility, anonymity, and nonjudgmental nature. However, understanding the psychological factors driving preferences for CA-based therapy remains critical to ensure ethical and effective application. Variables such as epistemic trust, attachment styles, personality traits, and fear of intimacy appear central in shaping attitudes toward these artificial intelligence (AI)-driven interventions. This study aimed to investigate the role of epistemic trust, attachment styles, personality traits, and fear of intimacy in influencing individuals' willingness to engage with CA-based therapy. An online survey was administered to 876 psychology students, yielding 736 responses (84.01% response rate). Variables measured included epistemic trust, attachment styles, personality traits, and fear of intimacy. A 5-point ordinal scale assessed willingness to engage in CA-based therapy. The data were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression models, including proportional odds models (POMs), nonproportional odds models (NPOMs), and partial proportional odds models (PPOMs), with residual deviance used to compare model fit. The PPOM provided the best model fit (residual deviance=3530.47), outperforming both the NPOM (deviance=6244.01) and the POM based on Brant test results indicating violations of the proportional odds assumption (χ²105=187.8; P
KW - psychotherapy
KW - Young Adult
KW - Personality
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Humans
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - CA
KW - Psychotherapy - methods
KW - conversational agents
KW - mental health
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - personality
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Fear - psychology
KW - epistemic trust
KW - Female
KW - AI
KW - Male
KW - Trust - psychology
KW - Middle Aged
U2 - 10.2196/70698
DO - 10.2196/70698
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40737594
VL - 12
JO - JMIR Human Factors
JF - JMIR Human Factors
SN - 2292-9495
M1 - e70698
ER -