Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Proposals for the Future of Leadership Scholarship

Electronic data

  • Master - Proposals for the Future of Leadership Scholarship

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Leadership, 18(4), 2022, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2022 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Leadership page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/SPP on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 613 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Proposals for the Future of Leadership Scholarship: Suggestions in Phronesis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Scott Allen
  • David Rosch
  • Joanne Ciulla
  • John Dugan
  • Brad Jackson
  • Stefanie Johnson
  • Cindy Pace
  • Steve Kempster
  • Eric Guthey
  • Susan Murphy
  • Ronald Reggio
  • Karen Schrier
  • Wiley Souba
  • Chellie Spiller
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/08/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Leadership
Issue number4
Volume18
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)563-589
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date5/05/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

“Phronesis” can be summarized as “wisdom in determining ends and the means of attaining them.” This unique article originated from comments made by scholars on a podcast hosted by Dr. Scott Allen titled “Phronesis: Practical Wisdom for Leaders.” Here, we propose ten specific agendas focused on the future of scholarship in the field of leadership studies, authored by some of these scholars. Topics include how to think about effective leadership in “the age of emotion” where truth can seem up for debate; specific topical suggestions for expanded study–such as more comprehensively studying place and space, indigenous wisdom, equity issues, games that teach, and focusing more on lifespan perspectives; better integrating scholarship with professional settings where leading occurs; and more effectively framing what it even means to lead and follow.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Leadership, 18(4), 2022, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2022 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Leadership page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/SPP on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/