Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol u...
View graph of relations

Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol using H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as the booster against the Egyptian avian influenza challenge virus

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Published

Standard

Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol using H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as the booster against the Egyptian avian influenza challenge virus. / Hussein, H A; Ahmed, B M; Aly, S M et al.
In: Acta virologica, Vol. 60, No. 3, 20.09.2016, p. 307-315.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

APA

Hussein, H. A., Ahmed, B. M., Aly, S. M., El-Deeb, A. H., El-Sanousi, A. A., Rohaim, M. A., Arafa, A. A., & Gadalla, M. R. (2016). Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol using H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as the booster against the Egyptian avian influenza challenge virus. Acta virologica, 60(3), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.4149/av_2016_03_307

Vancouver

Hussein HA, Ahmed BM, Aly SM, El-Deeb AH, El-Sanousi AA, Rohaim MA et al. Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol using H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as the booster against the Egyptian avian influenza challenge virus. Acta virologica. 2016 Sept 20;60(3):307-315. Epub 2016 Sept 13. doi: 10.4149/av_2016_03_307

Author

Bibtex

@article{44cc7b98837345948b971df39bc17596,
title = "Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol using H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as the booster against the Egyptian avian influenza challenge virus",
abstract = "In this study, a recombinant DNA plasmid was constructed, encoding for HA1 of a selected Egyptian H5N1 virus (isolated during the 2012 outbreaks). In the immunization and challenge experiments, SPF chickens received 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA plasmid prime, and boosted with the inactivated H5N2 vaccine. Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers, protection levels, and the magnitude of virus shedding were compared to that of the chickens that received either DNA plasmid or inactivated H5N2 vaccine alone. H5N1 virus A/chicken/Egypt/128s/2012 (H5N1) highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) clade 2.2.1/C was used for the challenge. Chickens immunized with 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA vaccine failed to overcome the challenge with 0% and 10% protection, respectively. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed virus shedding of 2.2 x 104 PCR copies/ml 3 days post challenge (dpc) in the only surviving bird from the group that received 2 doses of plasmid. However, chickens immunized with 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as booster, showed 80% protection after challenge, with a viral shedding of 1.2 x 104 PCR copies/ml (1 dose) and 1.6 x 104 PCR copies/ml (2 doses) 3 dpc. The surviving birds in both groups did not shed the virus at 5 and 7 dpc. In H5N2-vaccinated chickens, protection levels were 70% with relatively high virus shedding (1.8 x 104 PCR copies/ml) 3 dpc. HI titers were protective to the surviving chickens. This study reports the efficacy of H5-DNA plasmid to augment reduction in viral shedding and to provide better protection when applied in a prime-boost program with the inactivated AI vaccine. ",
keywords = "Animals, Chickens, Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology, Immunization, Secondary, Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype, Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/immunology, Influenza in Birds/immunology, Plasmids/immunology, Poultry Diseases/prevention & control, Vaccines, DNA/immunology, Viral Vaccines/immunology",
author = "Hussein, {H A} and Ahmed, {B M} and Aly, {S M} and El-Deeb, {A H} and El-Sanousi, {A A} and Rohaim, {Mohammed A} and Arafa, {A A} and Gadalla, {M R}",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "20",
doi = "10.4149/av_2016_03_307",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "307--315",
journal = "Acta virologica",
issn = "0001-723X",
publisher = "AEP - Academic Electronic Press Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protective efficacy of a prime-boost protocol using H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as the booster against the Egyptian avian influenza challenge virus

AU - Hussein, H A

AU - Ahmed, B M

AU - Aly, S M

AU - El-Deeb, A H

AU - El-Sanousi, A A

AU - Rohaim, Mohammed A

AU - Arafa, A A

AU - Gadalla, M R

PY - 2016/9/20

Y1 - 2016/9/20

N2 - In this study, a recombinant DNA plasmid was constructed, encoding for HA1 of a selected Egyptian H5N1 virus (isolated during the 2012 outbreaks). In the immunization and challenge experiments, SPF chickens received 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA plasmid prime, and boosted with the inactivated H5N2 vaccine. Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers, protection levels, and the magnitude of virus shedding were compared to that of the chickens that received either DNA plasmid or inactivated H5N2 vaccine alone. H5N1 virus A/chicken/Egypt/128s/2012 (H5N1) highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) clade 2.2.1/C was used for the challenge. Chickens immunized with 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA vaccine failed to overcome the challenge with 0% and 10% protection, respectively. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed virus shedding of 2.2 x 104 PCR copies/ml 3 days post challenge (dpc) in the only surviving bird from the group that received 2 doses of plasmid. However, chickens immunized with 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as booster, showed 80% protection after challenge, with a viral shedding of 1.2 x 104 PCR copies/ml (1 dose) and 1.6 x 104 PCR copies/ml (2 doses) 3 dpc. The surviving birds in both groups did not shed the virus at 5 and 7 dpc. In H5N2-vaccinated chickens, protection levels were 70% with relatively high virus shedding (1.8 x 104 PCR copies/ml) 3 dpc. HI titers were protective to the surviving chickens. This study reports the efficacy of H5-DNA plasmid to augment reduction in viral shedding and to provide better protection when applied in a prime-boost program with the inactivated AI vaccine.

AB - In this study, a recombinant DNA plasmid was constructed, encoding for HA1 of a selected Egyptian H5N1 virus (isolated during the 2012 outbreaks). In the immunization and challenge experiments, SPF chickens received 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA plasmid prime, and boosted with the inactivated H5N2 vaccine. Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers, protection levels, and the magnitude of virus shedding were compared to that of the chickens that received either DNA plasmid or inactivated H5N2 vaccine alone. H5N1 virus A/chicken/Egypt/128s/2012 (H5N1) highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) clade 2.2.1/C was used for the challenge. Chickens immunized with 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA vaccine failed to overcome the challenge with 0% and 10% protection, respectively. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed virus shedding of 2.2 x 104 PCR copies/ml 3 days post challenge (dpc) in the only surviving bird from the group that received 2 doses of plasmid. However, chickens immunized with 1 or 2 doses of H5-DNA plasmid as prime and inactivated H5N2 vaccine as booster, showed 80% protection after challenge, with a viral shedding of 1.2 x 104 PCR copies/ml (1 dose) and 1.6 x 104 PCR copies/ml (2 doses) 3 dpc. The surviving birds in both groups did not shed the virus at 5 and 7 dpc. In H5N2-vaccinated chickens, protection levels were 70% with relatively high virus shedding (1.8 x 104 PCR copies/ml) 3 dpc. HI titers were protective to the surviving chickens. This study reports the efficacy of H5-DNA plasmid to augment reduction in viral shedding and to provide better protection when applied in a prime-boost program with the inactivated AI vaccine.

KW - Animals

KW - Chickens

KW - Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology

KW - Immunization, Secondary

KW - Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype

KW - Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/immunology

KW - Influenza in Birds/immunology

KW - Plasmids/immunology

KW - Poultry Diseases/prevention & control

KW - Vaccines, DNA/immunology

KW - Viral Vaccines/immunology

U2 - 10.4149/av_2016_03_307

DO - 10.4149/av_2016_03_307

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27640441

VL - 60

SP - 307

EP - 315

JO - Acta virologica

JF - Acta virologica

SN - 0001-723X

IS - 3

ER -