Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for a...


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for assessing the internal validity of <i>in vitro</i> studies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

  • Camilla Svendsen
  • Gunn E. Vist
  • Trine Husøy
  • Anna Beronius
  • Emma Di Consiglio
  • Ingrid Druwe
  • Thomas Hartung
  • Vasiliki I. Hatzi
  • Sebastian Hoffmann
  • Carlijn R. Hooijmans
  • Kyriaki Machera
  • Joshua F. Robinson
  • Erwin Roggen
  • Andrew A. Rooney
  • Nicolas Roth
  • Eliana Spilioti
  • Anastasia Spyropoulou
  • Olga Tcheremenskaia
  • Emanuela Testai
  • Mathieu Vinken
  • Gro H. Mathisen
Article number2232415
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/12/2023
<mark>Journal</mark>Evidence-Based Toxicology
Issue number1
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date31/08/23
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This protocol describes the design and development of a tool for evaluation of the internal validity of in vitro studies, which is needed to include the data as evidence in systematic reviews and chemical risk assessments. The tool will be designed specifically to be applied to cell culture studies, including, but not restricted to, studies meeting the new approach methodology (NAM) definition. The tool is called INVITES-IN (IN VITro Experimental Studies INternal validity).

In this protocol, three of the four studies that will be performed to create the release version of INVITES-IN are described. In the first study, evaluation of existing assessment tools will be combined with focus group discussions to identify how characteristics of the design or conduct of an in vitro study can affect its internal validity. Bias domains and items considered to be of relevance for in vitro studies will be identified. In the second study, group agreement on internal validity domains and items of importance for in vitro studies will be identified via a modified Delphi methodology. In the third study, the draft version of the tool will be created, based on the data on relevance and importance of bias domains and items collected in Studies 1 and 2. A separate protocol will be prepared for the fourth study, which includes the user testing and validation of the tool, and collection of users’ experience.