Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Psychosocial factors impacting community-based ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review. / Heywood-Everett, Suzanne; Henderson, Rebecca; Webb, Claire et al.
In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 146, 104561, 31.10.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Heywood-Everett, S, Henderson, R, Webb, C & Bland, AR 2023, 'Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review', International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 146, 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104561

APA

Heywood-Everett, S., Henderson, R., Webb, C., & Bland, A. R. (2023). Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 146, Article 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104561

Vancouver

Heywood-Everett S, Henderson R, Webb C, Bland AR. Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2023 Oct 31;146:104561. Epub 2023 Aug 4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104561

Author

Heywood-Everett, Suzanne ; Henderson, Rebecca ; Webb, Claire et al. / Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention : A systematic review. In: International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2023 ; Vol. 146.

Bibtex

@article{cb855fe661564eea992375be74a5480e,
title = "Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review",
abstract = "BackgroundPressure ulcers are a major health concern. They have a significant impact on the healthcare system and individuals, reducing quality of life across several domains. In community settings, self-management behaviours are central to their prevention. However, adherence with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines remains low, with little evidence guiding the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals to establish a concordant partnership.ObjectiveTo synthesise evidence on factors contributing to community-based pressure ulcer prevention using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour.DesignMixed methods systematic review and narrative synthesis.MethodSystematic searches were conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on 14th December 2022. Studies were eligible if they contained data on the factors associated with adherence and concordance with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Methodological quality was assessed using the Hawker tool. Findings were synthesised using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The resulting themes were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model.ResultsThirty studies were included in the review, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. The synthesis identified 12 of the 14 Theoretical Domains Framework domains, with knowledge, social influences, beliefs about consequences, and beliefs about capabilities the most prevalent. Although knowledge appears to be an important contributor to adherence with prevention guidelines, knowledge alone does not appear sufficient to achieve concordance. A concordant relationship was facilitated by healthcare professionals' knowledge, motivation to work alongside patients and their priorities, and interpersonal skills to build rapport and trust, whilst barriers included lack of healthcare professional skills to navigate sensitive issues, paternalistic views of patient compliance and organisational processes that impact building rapport.ConclusionsSeveral psychosocial factors may affect the ability to achieve concordance between individuals, caregivers and healthcare professionals with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community. However, data regarding the efficacy of behaviour change interventions targeting these constructs is limited, with further research required to guide intervention development in this area.",
author = "Suzanne Heywood-Everett and Rebecca Henderson and Claire Webb and Bland, {Amy R.}",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104561",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Heywood-Everett, Suzanne

AU - Henderson, Rebecca

AU - Webb, Claire

AU - Bland, Amy R.

PY - 2023/10/31

Y1 - 2023/10/31

N2 - BackgroundPressure ulcers are a major health concern. They have a significant impact on the healthcare system and individuals, reducing quality of life across several domains. In community settings, self-management behaviours are central to their prevention. However, adherence with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines remains low, with little evidence guiding the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals to establish a concordant partnership.ObjectiveTo synthesise evidence on factors contributing to community-based pressure ulcer prevention using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour.DesignMixed methods systematic review and narrative synthesis.MethodSystematic searches were conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on 14th December 2022. Studies were eligible if they contained data on the factors associated with adherence and concordance with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Methodological quality was assessed using the Hawker tool. Findings were synthesised using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The resulting themes were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model.ResultsThirty studies were included in the review, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. The synthesis identified 12 of the 14 Theoretical Domains Framework domains, with knowledge, social influences, beliefs about consequences, and beliefs about capabilities the most prevalent. Although knowledge appears to be an important contributor to adherence with prevention guidelines, knowledge alone does not appear sufficient to achieve concordance. A concordant relationship was facilitated by healthcare professionals' knowledge, motivation to work alongside patients and their priorities, and interpersonal skills to build rapport and trust, whilst barriers included lack of healthcare professional skills to navigate sensitive issues, paternalistic views of patient compliance and organisational processes that impact building rapport.ConclusionsSeveral psychosocial factors may affect the ability to achieve concordance between individuals, caregivers and healthcare professionals with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community. However, data regarding the efficacy of behaviour change interventions targeting these constructs is limited, with further research required to guide intervention development in this area.

AB - BackgroundPressure ulcers are a major health concern. They have a significant impact on the healthcare system and individuals, reducing quality of life across several domains. In community settings, self-management behaviours are central to their prevention. However, adherence with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines remains low, with little evidence guiding the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals to establish a concordant partnership.ObjectiveTo synthesise evidence on factors contributing to community-based pressure ulcer prevention using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour.DesignMixed methods systematic review and narrative synthesis.MethodSystematic searches were conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on 14th December 2022. Studies were eligible if they contained data on the factors associated with adherence and concordance with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Methodological quality was assessed using the Hawker tool. Findings were synthesised using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The resulting themes were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model.ResultsThirty studies were included in the review, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. The synthesis identified 12 of the 14 Theoretical Domains Framework domains, with knowledge, social influences, beliefs about consequences, and beliefs about capabilities the most prevalent. Although knowledge appears to be an important contributor to adherence with prevention guidelines, knowledge alone does not appear sufficient to achieve concordance. A concordant relationship was facilitated by healthcare professionals' knowledge, motivation to work alongside patients and their priorities, and interpersonal skills to build rapport and trust, whilst barriers included lack of healthcare professional skills to navigate sensitive issues, paternalistic views of patient compliance and organisational processes that impact building rapport.ConclusionsSeveral psychosocial factors may affect the ability to achieve concordance between individuals, caregivers and healthcare professionals with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community. However, data regarding the efficacy of behaviour change interventions targeting these constructs is limited, with further research required to guide intervention development in this area.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104561

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104561

M3 - Journal article

VL - 146

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

M1 - 104561

ER -