Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: V...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges. / Jacobs, Naomi; Markovic, Milan; Cottrill, Caitlin Doyle et al.
2019. Paper presented at Data for Policy 2019, London, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Harvard

Jacobs, N, Markovic, M, Cottrill, CD, Edwards, P & Salt, K 2019, 'Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges', Paper presented at Data for Policy 2019, London, United Kingdom, 11/06/19 - 12/06/19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2713118

APA

Jacobs, N., Markovic, M., Cottrill, C. D., Edwards, P., & Salt, K. (2019). Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges. Paper presented at Data for Policy 2019, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2713118

Vancouver

Jacobs N, Markovic M, Cottrill CD, Edwards P, Salt K. Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges. 2019. Paper presented at Data for Policy 2019, London, United Kingdom. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2713118

Author

Jacobs, Naomi ; Markovic, Milan ; Cottrill, Caitlin Doyle et al. / Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges. Paper presented at Data for Policy 2019, London, United Kingdom.6 p.

Bibtex

@conference{41ed505d958849a197c76a21f482353b,
title = "Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges",
abstract = "Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as connected sensors are increasingly being used in the public sector, often deployed and collecting data in public spaces. While broadly perceived as beneficial by policy makers, such technology presents new challenges for governance. A theme commonly seen in the rhetoric surrounding public space IoT initiatives is empowerment. However, it is important to ask who is empowered and who benefits, and we must ensure that such technological interventions follow democratic principles and are trusted by citizens.In this paper we describe work that utilises design fiction interventions in a community setting to explore questions of privacy, data management, risk and trust in relation to public space IoT deployments. Our findings suggest that agency, transparency and intent associated with IoT systems are key components that must be considered, particularly when multiple actors and stakeholders are involved.We suggest that good governance requires consideration of these systems in their entirety, throughout the process, and in consultation with multiple stakeholders who are impacted, including the public. To achieve this effectively, we argue for transparency at the device and system level, which may require legislative change.",
keywords = "internet of things, accountability, transparency, trust",
author = "Naomi Jacobs and Milan Markovic and Cottrill, {Caitlin Doyle} and Pete Edwards and Karen Salt",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "10",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.2713118",
language = "English",
note = "Data for Policy 2019 : Digital Trust and Personal Data ; Conference date: 11-06-2019 Through 12-06-2019",
url = "https://www.ucl.ac.uk/grand-challenges/events/2019/jun/data-policy-2019-digital-trust-and-personal-data",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Public Sector Internet of Things Deployments: Value, Transparency, Risks and Challenges

AU - Jacobs, Naomi

AU - Markovic, Milan

AU - Cottrill, Caitlin Doyle

AU - Edwards, Pete

AU - Salt, Karen

N1 - Conference code: 4th

PY - 2019/5/10

Y1 - 2019/5/10

N2 - Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as connected sensors are increasingly being used in the public sector, often deployed and collecting data in public spaces. While broadly perceived as beneficial by policy makers, such technology presents new challenges for governance. A theme commonly seen in the rhetoric surrounding public space IoT initiatives is empowerment. However, it is important to ask who is empowered and who benefits, and we must ensure that such technological interventions follow democratic principles and are trusted by citizens.In this paper we describe work that utilises design fiction interventions in a community setting to explore questions of privacy, data management, risk and trust in relation to public space IoT deployments. Our findings suggest that agency, transparency and intent associated with IoT systems are key components that must be considered, particularly when multiple actors and stakeholders are involved.We suggest that good governance requires consideration of these systems in their entirety, throughout the process, and in consultation with multiple stakeholders who are impacted, including the public. To achieve this effectively, we argue for transparency at the device and system level, which may require legislative change.

AB - Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as connected sensors are increasingly being used in the public sector, often deployed and collecting data in public spaces. While broadly perceived as beneficial by policy makers, such technology presents new challenges for governance. A theme commonly seen in the rhetoric surrounding public space IoT initiatives is empowerment. However, it is important to ask who is empowered and who benefits, and we must ensure that such technological interventions follow democratic principles and are trusted by citizens.In this paper we describe work that utilises design fiction interventions in a community setting to explore questions of privacy, data management, risk and trust in relation to public space IoT deployments. Our findings suggest that agency, transparency and intent associated with IoT systems are key components that must be considered, particularly when multiple actors and stakeholders are involved.We suggest that good governance requires consideration of these systems in their entirety, throughout the process, and in consultation with multiple stakeholders who are impacted, including the public. To achieve this effectively, we argue for transparency at the device and system level, which may require legislative change.

KW - internet of things

KW - accountability

KW - transparency

KW - trust

U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.2713118

DO - 10.5281/zenodo.2713118

M3 - Conference paper

T2 - Data for Policy 2019

Y2 - 11 June 2019 through 12 June 2019

ER -