Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Qualitative research practices and family busin...

Electronic data

  • JFBS_Revised_version_20th_July_2015_2_

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Family Business Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Family Business Research, 7, 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001

    Accepted author manuscript, 289 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: a review and future research agenda

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: a review and future research agenda. / Fletcher, Denise; De Massis, Alfredo; Nordqvist, Mattias.
In: Journal of Family Business Strategy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 04.03.2016, p. 8-25.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fletcher D, De Massis A, Nordqvist M. Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: a review and future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2016 Mar 4;7(1):8-25. Epub 2015 Oct 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001

Author

Fletcher, Denise ; De Massis, Alfredo ; Nordqvist, Mattias. / Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship : a review and future research agenda. In: Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 8-25.

Bibtex

@article{50e509daeedc4255b1dd4b6a5872f63d,
title = "Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: a review and future research agenda",
abstract = "In spite of various calls for a wider application of qualitative research in the family business field, it is our contention that the full potential of qualitative inquiry is not being fully realized. Part of the reason for this relates to the tendency to promote methods choice and diversity rather than addressing the foundational questions and processes which underlie qualitative research choices. These tendencies obscure attention to the reasons why researchers choose qualitative methods and the kinds of foundational issues about family businesses that are brought to light through qualitative research. To address this, we undertake an analysis of the most-cited articles using qualitative methods from an annotated bibliography of family business studies. From this, we identify the strengths and weaknesses of extant qualitative studies in family business research and argue for the need to re-orientate calls in family business research towards the foundational questions (rather than methods) that underline qualitative inquiry.",
keywords = "Qualitative research, Qualitative methods, Epistemology, Interpretivism, Family business, Future research",
author = "Denise Fletcher and {De Massis}, Alfredo and Mattias Nordqvist",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Family Business Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Family Business Research, 7, 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "8--25",
journal = "Journal of Family Business Strategy",
issn = "1877-8585",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship

T2 - a review and future research agenda

AU - Fletcher, Denise

AU - De Massis, Alfredo

AU - Nordqvist, Mattias

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Family Business Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Family Business Research, 7, 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001

PY - 2016/3/4

Y1 - 2016/3/4

N2 - In spite of various calls for a wider application of qualitative research in the family business field, it is our contention that the full potential of qualitative inquiry is not being fully realized. Part of the reason for this relates to the tendency to promote methods choice and diversity rather than addressing the foundational questions and processes which underlie qualitative research choices. These tendencies obscure attention to the reasons why researchers choose qualitative methods and the kinds of foundational issues about family businesses that are brought to light through qualitative research. To address this, we undertake an analysis of the most-cited articles using qualitative methods from an annotated bibliography of family business studies. From this, we identify the strengths and weaknesses of extant qualitative studies in family business research and argue for the need to re-orientate calls in family business research towards the foundational questions (rather than methods) that underline qualitative inquiry.

AB - In spite of various calls for a wider application of qualitative research in the family business field, it is our contention that the full potential of qualitative inquiry is not being fully realized. Part of the reason for this relates to the tendency to promote methods choice and diversity rather than addressing the foundational questions and processes which underlie qualitative research choices. These tendencies obscure attention to the reasons why researchers choose qualitative methods and the kinds of foundational issues about family businesses that are brought to light through qualitative research. To address this, we undertake an analysis of the most-cited articles using qualitative methods from an annotated bibliography of family business studies. From this, we identify the strengths and weaknesses of extant qualitative studies in family business research and argue for the need to re-orientate calls in family business research towards the foundational questions (rather than methods) that underline qualitative inquiry.

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Epistemology

KW - Interpretivism

KW - Family business

KW - Future research

U2 - 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 8

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Family Business Strategy

JF - Journal of Family Business Strategy

SN - 1877-8585

IS - 1

ER -