Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Quantifying cost of disease in livestock

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases. / Gilbert, William; Marsh, Thomas L; Chaters, Gemma et al.
In: The Lancet. Planetary health, Vol. 8, No. 5, 31.05.2024, p. e309-e317.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Gilbert, W, Marsh, TL, Chaters, G, Jemberu, WT, Bruce, M, Steeneveld, W, Afonso, JS, Huntington, B & Rushton, J 2024, 'Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases', The Lancet. Planetary health, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. e309-e317. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00047-0

APA

Gilbert, W., Marsh, T. L., Chaters, G., Jemberu, W. T., Bruce, M., Steeneveld, W., Afonso, J. S., Huntington, B., & Rushton, J. (2024). Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases. The Lancet. Planetary health, 8(5), e309-e317. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00047-0

Vancouver

Gilbert W, Marsh TL, Chaters G, Jemberu WT, Bruce M, Steeneveld W et al. Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases. The Lancet. Planetary health. 2024 May 31;8(5):e309-e317. Epub 2024 May 8. doi: 10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00047-0

Author

Gilbert, William ; Marsh, Thomas L ; Chaters, Gemma et al. / Quantifying cost of disease in livestock : a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases. In: The Lancet. Planetary health. 2024 ; Vol. 8, No. 5. pp. e309-e317.

Bibtex

@article{b2cd575403474d5baa4f1318e7b6f148,
title = "Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases",
abstract = "BackgroundIncreasing awareness of the environmental and public health impacts of expanding and intensifying animal-based food and farming systems creates discord, with the reliance of much of the world's population on animals for livelihoods and essential nutrition. Increasing the efficiency of food production through improved animal health has been identified as a step towards minimising these negative effects without compromising global food security. The Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme aims to provide data and analytical methods to support positive change in animal health across all livestock and aquaculture animal populations.MethodsIn this study, we present a metric that begins the process of disease burden estimation by converting the physical consequences of disease on animal performance to farm-level costs of disease, and calculates a metric termed the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) via comparison between the status quo and a disease-free ideal. An example calculation of the AHLE metric for meat production from broiler chickens is provided.FindingsThe AHLE presents the direct financial costs of disease at farm-level for all causes by estimating losses and expenditure in a given farming system. The general specification of the model measures productivity change at farm-level and provides an upper bound on productivity change in the absence of disease. On its own, it gives an indication of the scale of total disease cost at farm-level.InterpretationThe AHLE is an essential stepping stone within the GBADs programme because it connects the physical performance of animals in farming systems under different environmental and management conditions and different health states to farm economics. Moving forward, AHLE results will be an important step in calculating the wider monetary consequences of changes in animal health as part of the GBADs programme.",
author = "William Gilbert and Marsh, {Thomas L} and Gemma Chaters and Jemberu, {Wudu T} and Mieghan Bruce and Wilma Steeneveld and Afonso, {Joao S} and Benjamin Huntington and Jonathan Rushton",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00047-0",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e309--e317",
journal = "The Lancet. Planetary health",
issn = "2542-5196",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying cost of disease in livestock

T2 - a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases

AU - Gilbert, William

AU - Marsh, Thomas L

AU - Chaters, Gemma

AU - Jemberu, Wudu T

AU - Bruce, Mieghan

AU - Steeneveld, Wilma

AU - Afonso, Joao S

AU - Huntington, Benjamin

AU - Rushton, Jonathan

PY - 2024/5/31

Y1 - 2024/5/31

N2 - BackgroundIncreasing awareness of the environmental and public health impacts of expanding and intensifying animal-based food and farming systems creates discord, with the reliance of much of the world's population on animals for livelihoods and essential nutrition. Increasing the efficiency of food production through improved animal health has been identified as a step towards minimising these negative effects without compromising global food security. The Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme aims to provide data and analytical methods to support positive change in animal health across all livestock and aquaculture animal populations.MethodsIn this study, we present a metric that begins the process of disease burden estimation by converting the physical consequences of disease on animal performance to farm-level costs of disease, and calculates a metric termed the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) via comparison between the status quo and a disease-free ideal. An example calculation of the AHLE metric for meat production from broiler chickens is provided.FindingsThe AHLE presents the direct financial costs of disease at farm-level for all causes by estimating losses and expenditure in a given farming system. The general specification of the model measures productivity change at farm-level and provides an upper bound on productivity change in the absence of disease. On its own, it gives an indication of the scale of total disease cost at farm-level.InterpretationThe AHLE is an essential stepping stone within the GBADs programme because it connects the physical performance of animals in farming systems under different environmental and management conditions and different health states to farm economics. Moving forward, AHLE results will be an important step in calculating the wider monetary consequences of changes in animal health as part of the GBADs programme.

AB - BackgroundIncreasing awareness of the environmental and public health impacts of expanding and intensifying animal-based food and farming systems creates discord, with the reliance of much of the world's population on animals for livelihoods and essential nutrition. Increasing the efficiency of food production through improved animal health has been identified as a step towards minimising these negative effects without compromising global food security. The Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme aims to provide data and analytical methods to support positive change in animal health across all livestock and aquaculture animal populations.MethodsIn this study, we present a metric that begins the process of disease burden estimation by converting the physical consequences of disease on animal performance to farm-level costs of disease, and calculates a metric termed the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) via comparison between the status quo and a disease-free ideal. An example calculation of the AHLE metric for meat production from broiler chickens is provided.FindingsThe AHLE presents the direct financial costs of disease at farm-level for all causes by estimating losses and expenditure in a given farming system. The general specification of the model measures productivity change at farm-level and provides an upper bound on productivity change in the absence of disease. On its own, it gives an indication of the scale of total disease cost at farm-level.InterpretationThe AHLE is an essential stepping stone within the GBADs programme because it connects the physical performance of animals in farming systems under different environmental and management conditions and different health states to farm economics. Moving forward, AHLE results will be an important step in calculating the wider monetary consequences of changes in animal health as part of the GBADs programme.

U2 - 10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00047-0

DO - 10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00047-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - e309-e317

JO - The Lancet. Planetary health

JF - The Lancet. Planetary health

SN - 2542-5196

IS - 5

ER -