Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Zheng, C. , Ferrari, D. , Zhang, M. and Baird, P. (2019), Ranking the importance of genetic factors by variable‐selection confidence sets. J. R. Stat. Soc. C, 68: 727-749. doi:10.1111/rssc.12337 which has been published in final form at https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/rssc.12337 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Accepted author manuscript, 402 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ranking the importance of genetic factors by variable-selection confidence sets
AU - Zheng, Chao
AU - Ferrari, Davide
AU - Zhang, Michael
AU - Baird, Paul
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Zheng, C. , Ferrari, D. , Zhang, M. and Baird, P. (2019), Ranking the importance of genetic factors by variable‐selection confidence sets. J. R. Stat. Soc. C, 68: 727-749. doi:10.1111/rssc.12337 which has been published in final form at https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/rssc.12337 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - The widespread use of generalized linear models in case–control genetic studies has helped to identify many disease-associated risk factors typically defined as DNA variants, or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Up to now, most literature has focused on selecting a unique best subset of SNPs based on some statistical perspective. When the noise is large compared with the signal, however, multiple biological paths are often found to be supported by a given data set. We address the ambiguity related to SNP selection by constructing a list of models—called a variable-selection confidence set (VSCS)—which contains the collection of all well-supported SNP combinations at a user-specified confidence level. The VSCS extends the familiar notion of confidence intervals in the variable-selection setting and provides the practitioner with new tools aiding the variable-selection activity beyond trusting a single model. On the basis of the VSCS, we consider natural graphical and numerical statistics measuring the inclusion importance of an SNP based on its frequency in the most parsimonious VSCS models. This work is motivated by available case–control genetic data on age-related macular degeneration, which is a widespread disease and leading cause of loss of vision. © 2019 Royal Statistical Society
AB - The widespread use of generalized linear models in case–control genetic studies has helped to identify many disease-associated risk factors typically defined as DNA variants, or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Up to now, most literature has focused on selecting a unique best subset of SNPs based on some statistical perspective. When the noise is large compared with the signal, however, multiple biological paths are often found to be supported by a given data set. We address the ambiguity related to SNP selection by constructing a list of models—called a variable-selection confidence set (VSCS)—which contains the collection of all well-supported SNP combinations at a user-specified confidence level. The VSCS extends the familiar notion of confidence intervals in the variable-selection setting and provides the practitioner with new tools aiding the variable-selection activity beyond trusting a single model. On the basis of the VSCS, we consider natural graphical and numerical statistics measuring the inclusion importance of an SNP based on its frequency in the most parsimonious VSCS models. This work is motivated by available case–control genetic data on age-related macular degeneration, which is a widespread disease and leading cause of loss of vision. © 2019 Royal Statistical Society
KW - Age-related macular degeneration
KW - Case–control genotype data
KW - Likelihood ratio test
KW - Predictor ranking
KW - Variable-selection confidence set
U2 - 10.1111/rssc.12337
DO - 10.1111/rssc.12337
M3 - Journal article
VL - 68
SP - 727
EP - 749
JO - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)
JF - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)
SN - 0035-9254
IS - 3
ER -