Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in B...

Electronic data

  • França_et_al(2021)Land_Use_Policy - pre-print

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 108, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195

    Accepted author manuscript, 319 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation: A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation: A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”. / França, F.; Solar, R.; Lees, A.C. et al.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 108, 105195, 30.09.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

França F, Solar R, Lees AC, Martins LP, Berenguer E, Barlow J. Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation: A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”. Land Use Policy. 2021 Sept 30;108:105195. Epub 2021 May 26. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195

Author

Bibtex

@article{c80fc7acb0a2426397d012aab56ae5b5,
title = "Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation: A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”",
abstract = "Silva et al. (Land Use Policy, 21 July 2020) offer an assessment of the links between deforestation, livestock production and exports in Brazil. Their analysis, based on relative changes in beef production and pasture area across the whole of Brazil, showed an “apparent decoupling of the link between beef production and deforestation in Brazil”. In reanalysing these links, we find that Silva et al. underestimate the strong, positive and significant associations between Brazilian livestock production and deforestation. Moreover, despite focusing the title, abstract and the beginning of their manuscript on the Amazon, their analyses are conducted at the national level, and fail to recognise marked differences in the development trajectories of Brazilian biomes, and that most of the recent pasture expansion in Brazil has replaced Amazonian forests. To progress any debate and aid decision-making regarding land-use changes in the Amazon, a region often in the spotlight and subjected to many debates that lack evidence, scientists must be open and scrupulous with their data sources and analyses. {\textcopyright} 2020",
keywords = "Amazon, Deforestation, Forest clearance, Land-use change, Livestock production, Pasture",
author = "F. Fran{\c c}a and R. Solar and A.C. Lees and L.P. Martins and E. Berenguer and J. Barlow",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 108, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation

T2 - A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”

AU - França, F.

AU - Solar, R.

AU - Lees, A.C.

AU - Martins, L.P.

AU - Berenguer, E.

AU - Barlow, J.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy, 108, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195

PY - 2021/9/30

Y1 - 2021/9/30

N2 - Silva et al. (Land Use Policy, 21 July 2020) offer an assessment of the links between deforestation, livestock production and exports in Brazil. Their analysis, based on relative changes in beef production and pasture area across the whole of Brazil, showed an “apparent decoupling of the link between beef production and deforestation in Brazil”. In reanalysing these links, we find that Silva et al. underestimate the strong, positive and significant associations between Brazilian livestock production and deforestation. Moreover, despite focusing the title, abstract and the beginning of their manuscript on the Amazon, their analyses are conducted at the national level, and fail to recognise marked differences in the development trajectories of Brazilian biomes, and that most of the recent pasture expansion in Brazil has replaced Amazonian forests. To progress any debate and aid decision-making regarding land-use changes in the Amazon, a region often in the spotlight and subjected to many debates that lack evidence, scientists must be open and scrupulous with their data sources and analyses. © 2020

AB - Silva et al. (Land Use Policy, 21 July 2020) offer an assessment of the links between deforestation, livestock production and exports in Brazil. Their analysis, based on relative changes in beef production and pasture area across the whole of Brazil, showed an “apparent decoupling of the link between beef production and deforestation in Brazil”. In reanalysing these links, we find that Silva et al. underestimate the strong, positive and significant associations between Brazilian livestock production and deforestation. Moreover, despite focusing the title, abstract and the beginning of their manuscript on the Amazon, their analyses are conducted at the national level, and fail to recognise marked differences in the development trajectories of Brazilian biomes, and that most of the recent pasture expansion in Brazil has replaced Amazonian forests. To progress any debate and aid decision-making regarding land-use changes in the Amazon, a region often in the spotlight and subjected to many debates that lack evidence, scientists must be open and scrupulous with their data sources and analyses. © 2020

KW - Amazon

KW - Deforestation

KW - Forest clearance

KW - Land-use change

KW - Livestock production

KW - Pasture

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195

M3 - Journal article

VL - 108

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

M1 - 105195

ER -