TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Regrets become a lasting source of pain’

T2 - A qualitative study on family caregivers’ experiences leading up to a relative’s death

AU - Liang, Hui-Ju

AU - Xiong, Qian

AU - Preston, Nancy

PY - 2025/3/31

Y1 - 2025/3/31

N2 - Background:Death preparations can benefit families both before and during bereavement. While these preparations are culturally influenced, evidence from non-Western cultures, like Eastern Asia, is limited.Aim:To explore how family caregivers prepare for a relative’s death in Taiwan.Design:A qualitative interview study analysed with reflexive thematic analysis.Setting/participants:Twenty-two primary family caregivers following a death involving specialist palliative care were interviewed.Results:An overarching theme was ‘getting everything right to have no regrets between the dead and the living’. Within this, two themes focussed upon improving the dying relative’s outcomes and the families’ subsequent bereavement: (1) ‘making the right end-of-life decisions is crucial but complex’, exploring preparations to involve (or not) the dying relative in making choices to minimise regrets. Participants often felt they understood the dying relative’s wishes so respected their preferences while maintaining family harmony through consensus-building and professional guidance. (2) ‘becoming a competent caregiver is the priority’, addressing preparations for fulfilling responsibilities, making sacrifices and developing caregiving competence to ensure the dying relative’s comfort. This would help reduce feelings of regret about not having done enough.Conclusion:Preparing for end-of-life decisions and caregiving is important for participants to reduce regret, benefiting subsequent bereavement. Of particular importance is family involvement and consensus-building in end-of-life decisions, reflecting Taiwan’s family-led culture. These findings can inform clinical practices in family-centric decision-making cultures where healthcare workers should be aware of the need to build consensus, sometimes without involving the dying person. Future research should include patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives.

AB - Background:Death preparations can benefit families both before and during bereavement. While these preparations are culturally influenced, evidence from non-Western cultures, like Eastern Asia, is limited.Aim:To explore how family caregivers prepare for a relative’s death in Taiwan.Design:A qualitative interview study analysed with reflexive thematic analysis.Setting/participants:Twenty-two primary family caregivers following a death involving specialist palliative care were interviewed.Results:An overarching theme was ‘getting everything right to have no regrets between the dead and the living’. Within this, two themes focussed upon improving the dying relative’s outcomes and the families’ subsequent bereavement: (1) ‘making the right end-of-life decisions is crucial but complex’, exploring preparations to involve (or not) the dying relative in making choices to minimise regrets. Participants often felt they understood the dying relative’s wishes so respected their preferences while maintaining family harmony through consensus-building and professional guidance. (2) ‘becoming a competent caregiver is the priority’, addressing preparations for fulfilling responsibilities, making sacrifices and developing caregiving competence to ensure the dying relative’s comfort. This would help reduce feelings of regret about not having done enough.Conclusion:Preparing for end-of-life decisions and caregiving is important for participants to reduce regret, benefiting subsequent bereavement. Of particular importance is family involvement and consensus-building in end-of-life decisions, reflecting Taiwan’s family-led culture. These findings can inform clinical practices in family-centric decision-making cultures where healthcare workers should be aware of the need to build consensus, sometimes without involving the dying person. Future research should include patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives.

U2 - 10.1177/02692163251316677

DO - 10.1177/02692163251316677

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39927610

VL - 39

SP - 401

EP - 412

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 3

ER -